From: KH.Ranitzsch@t... (K.H.Ranitzsch)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 19:39:38 +0100
Subject: Re: Gyrobombs
[quoted original message omitted]
Gyrobombs
From: KH.Ranitzsch@t... (K.H.Ranitzsch)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 19:46:21 +0100
Subject: Re: Gyrobombs
[quoted original message omitted]
From: B Lin <lin@r...>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 13:38:36 -0700
Subject: RE: Gyrobombs
I wonder if a gyrobomb sounds like a turbine? It would make them easier to detect with sonic directional amplifiers. Sounds like a great sci-fi movie weapon - Hero hears the slowly building whining sound and knows he's in trouble...
From: Roger Burton West <roger@f...>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 20:38:57 +0000
Subject: Re: Gyrobombs
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 07:39:38PM +0100, K.H.Ranitzsch wrote: The > mine ideas is quite neat, still (and self.defusing over time) I'm assuming the warhead would be mounted in a gimballed frame to allow the outer casing to be rotated freely.
From: KH.Ranitzsch@t... (K.H.Ranitzsch)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 21:48:06 +0100
Subject: Re: Gyrobombs
[quoted original message omitted]
From: KH.Ranitzsch@t... (K.H.Ranitzsch)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 21:50:58 +0100
Subject: Re: Gyrobombs
[quoted original message omitted]
From: Roger Burton West <roger@f...>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 21:04:48 +0000
Subject: Re: Gyrobombs
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 01:38:36PM -0700, B Lin wrote: Hmm, well... I hope not. That sound goes with energy loss due to friction - all you _should_ hear is the sound of the bearings in the vacuum can...
From: KH.Ranitzsch@t... (K.H.Ranitzsch)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 22:06:11 +0100
Subject: Re: Gyrobombs
[quoted original message omitted]