Gurkha Figs

1 posts ยท May 31 2002

From: Thomas Barclay <Thomas.Barclay@s...>

Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 15:47:35 -0400

Subject: Gurkha Figs

When the Gurkha figs were being spec'd out (we
were negotiating on poses etc with Nic/Mike),
we spec'd that they'd be a bit smaller than the NAC. They are stockier (a bit)
out of consideration for how easy it is to destroy some NAC figures (the old
style ones.... Jon's newer ones are more robust with thicker legs and ankles)
but they are a bit (noticeably) shorter than the average NAC figure. This was
an intentional design character point as was using NAC firepower.

Tomb.

PS - I notice everyone is rushing to defend their
country again, even though war has not been declared. This is a natural
response for many of us who have worn the cammie jammies (goes
with the indoctrination/motivation), but maybe
we should all just chill.... the US, though hardly the saviour of the universe
on a white charger, has done a lot of good out there (IMO). It's had some good
moments and some bad. I think Sr.Tuffley said "There are no good guys" in the
GZGverse, by that meaning every country acts in what it perceives to be its
own interests of the moment. That's true in 2183, was probably true in 0083
and will probably be true in 10083.... <climbs down off soapbox>

Lighten up, go grab a beverage of your choice,
and lets go back to discussing sci-fi games with
neat little metal figures. It's less likely to get anyones intestines in a
twist.