Ground Rules / Re: More thoughts on Encyclopedia

1 posts ยท Jan 27 1999

From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <schoon@a...>

Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 09:15:01 -0800

Subject: Ground Rules / Re: More thoughts on Encyclopedia

> My concern becomes, again, that the canon GZG be separated somehow,

I agree entirely that official background be somehow distinguished from
that which is generated by people who - entirely justifiably - have made
their own little niches.

However, there does exist the possibility (I'm really quite suprised that no
one has mentioned it yet) that some small elements of our little project might
become official if OKed by Jon.

That means, however, that we've all got to be reasonable with each other on
this. I my eye's that means:

1) NO modifying existing history from the GZG books unless specifically
mentioning that it's a non-approved background.

2) NO making your nationality/zone/whatever the awesome, kick-butt,
all-rulers of the universe. Many of the the FB ship designs are "flawed"
or not optimized. In my eyes, this is entirely correct. Many military designs
are missteps down a design path that was later found to be flawed. Contractors
push systems that are less than perfect. Likewise, no government is perfect;
they all make (sometimes rather
major) mistakes, and they all loose battles, often as many - if not more
-
than they win. Make sure these ideas are reflected in designs and histories.

3) COMPROMISE when conflicts arise between two authors. Often you can discover
new ideas when brainstorming integration difficulties that you wouldn't have
come up with on your own.