From: Jon Davis <davisje@n...>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 22:03:12 -0400
Subject: FTJava: Fighter status for V0.16
A new screenshot has been added with a more mature fighter group user interface. Your comments are welcome.
FTJava: Fighter status for V0.16
From: Robertson, Brendan <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 12:13:10 +1000
Subject: RE: FTJava: Fighter status for V0.16
MKWIII here we come! Brendan 'Neath Southern Skies > -----Original Message----- IMPORTANT 1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses. 2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential information for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email. 3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are not a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated. 4. Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous publications and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic messages. 5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe emails of this type from DVA. 6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.
From: Jerry Han <jhan@w...>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 00:39:56 -0400
Subject: Re: FTJava: Fighter status for V0.16
Geeze, Jon, that's all starting to look really, really good. (8-) JGH > Jon Davis wrote:
From: Derk Groeneveld <derk@c...>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 07:51:42 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: FTJava: Fighter status for V0.16
> A new screenshot has been added with a more mature Looking good! If folks will be running games, I'd like to try my hand at it? Been a good while since the last time I played in an online FT game. And it might actually get me to paint my NSL fleet;) Cheers,
From: Indy Kochte <kochte@s...>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 07:55:52 -0400
Subject: Re: FTJava: Fighter status for V0.16
> Jerry Han wrote: Starting?? ;-) Mk > A new screenshot has been added with a more mature
From: Derk Groeneveld <derk@c...>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 14:49:10 +0200
Subject: Re: FTJava: Fighter status for V0.16
> A new screenshot has been added with a more mature > A new screenshot has been added with a more mature Looking good! If folks will be running games, I'd like to try my hand at it? Been a good while since the last time I played in an online FT game. And it might actually get me to paint my NSL fleet;) Cheers,
From: Jerry Han <jhan@w...>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 09:20:26 -0400
Subject: Re: FTJava: Fighter status for V0.16
> Indy wrote: Sorry, it's the first time I've looked at the program since... last year? So, while all of you have seen the light, I've just opened my eyes. (8-) And I'll just shut up now and go back to my little world. (8-) JGH > A new screenshot has been added with a more mature
From: Indy Kochte <kochte@s...>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 10:17:18 -0400
Subject: Re: FTJava: Fighter status for V0.16
> Jerry Han wrote: No, Jerry. Stay. Stay for the symphonie. :-) Mk > A new screenshot has been added with a more mature
From: Tim Jones <Tim.Jones@S...>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 23:40:52 +0100
Subject: Re: FTJava: Fighter status for V0.16
Hi Jon it just gets better, well done, big effort to get this out is there a stand-alone server available so you can play on a LAN or peer to peer - this is the one feature I would really love to be able to do having little space at present for minis. how things have moved on since those early pixel maps and applets
From: Roger Burton West <roger@f...>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 00:41:15 +0100
Subject: Re: FTJava: Fighter status for V0.16
> On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 07:51:42AM +0200, derkgroe@xs4all.nl wrote: > If folks will be running games, I'd like to try my hand at it? Been a The place to sign up is http://firedrake.org/cgi-bin/ftjava.cgi (another arm of the Sinister Firedrake Conspiracy).
From: Jon Davis <davisje@n...>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 22:15:18 -0400
Subject: Re: FTJava: Fighter status for V0.16
> Robertson, Brendan wrote: > MKWIII here we come! Did MKII ever finish? I thought it got delayed and abandoned.
From: Robertson, Brendan <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 12:41:56 +1000
Subject: RE: FTJava: Fighter status for V0.16
Abandoned due to RL issues for the GM. At the point it finished, the fighters had finished their mutual annihilation and the survivors were about to start anti-ship attacks. There was some debate about who had the superior position; the Humans had more active ships left, but a wave of KV had gotted behind the recon ships and my own flotilla was 5 carriers. Brendan 'Neath Southern Skies aka Admiral Alfred K. Hole, Officer Commanding MKW1&2 > -----Original Message----- IMPORTANT 1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses. 2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential information for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email. 3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are not a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated. 4. Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous publications and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic messages. 5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe emails of this type from DVA. 6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.
From: Robertson, Brendan <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 12:56:36 +1000
Subject: RE: FTJava: Fighter status for V0.16
Jon, just had an idea for the larger games. Is it possible to have an option for "Fog of War; Allied ships"? Makes communications with subordinates and allies part of the experience as opposed to god's eye view of friendly forces. Of course, this will also unclutter the interface to only the ships of immediate interest. Brendan 'Neath Southern Skies > -----Original Message----- IMPORTANT 1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses. 2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential information for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email. 3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are not a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated. 4. Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous publications and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic messages. 5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe emails of this type from DVA. 6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.