From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 21:18:16 -0500
Subject: Re: FTFB: Is this in the Errata?
> Not listed in the errata I've seen to date: came across this in Is good Deutsch armor, better than Englander armor for same price and weight.
From: Jared E Noble <JNOBLE2@m...>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 16:41:27 -1000
Subject: FTFB: Is this in the Errata?
Not listed in the errata I've seen to date: came across this in checking my new spreadsheet version: p26 - Der Thererdank class Fighter Carrier. Technical specs claim grade 14 armor. Systems Display shows 15 (I've counted it many times.) Anyway, mass and cost as shown seem to match with the grade 14 armor listed in the technical specs. if grade 15 armor is intended I show TMF of 222, NPV of 743. Assuming of course my spreadsheet is working, which is pretty much is. Anyone have insight?
From: Aaron Teske <ateske@H...>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 22:08:27 -0500
Subject: Re: FTFB: Is this in the Errata?
> At 04:41 PM 10/28/98 -1000, you wrote: Someone in the layout area got a twitchy finger, or liked the NSL? ^_^; Just for the record, it's 14; at least that's how much armor Jon gave the class in the "proofread" list he sent out. Odd how errors crop up in things you thought were correct.... Later,
From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 12:16:12 +0100
Subject: Re: FTFB: Is this in the Errata?
> Jared wrote: > Not listed in the errata I've seen to date: came across this in Der Theuerdank :-/ > Technical specs claim grade 14 armor. Systems Display shows 15 (I've Should be grade 14, mass 220, NPV 737 (or at least that's the design I checked <g>). Good catch - this is IIRC the first design where the System Status Display is wrong rather than the tech specs. (Able Spacehand Funk aboard the Arc Royal-class doesn't count since he has no effect on the game <g>) Later,