[FTFB] FAQ request (was Re: [FTFB] NPV cost error in NSL BDN?)

3 posts ยท Jan 6 1999 to Jan 8 1999

From: -MWS- <Hauptman@c...>

Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 13:00:29 -0500 (EST)

Subject: [FTFB] FAQ request (was Re: [FTFB] NPV cost error in NSL BDN?)

> On Wed, 6 Jan 1999, Ground Zero Games wrote:

> >Greetings!
This
> would account for the 18 points difference (the cost of one standard

Ahhhh. That makes sense, but is *NOT* obvious. Can the FAQman please add a BIG
BOLD note about this in the FB section? I'm sure I'm not the only one who has
assumed that the FB ship designs come already equipped with a full load of
standard fighters when a bay symbol is shown.

Thanks for clearing that up.:)

From: Tim Jones <Tim.Jones@S...>

Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 08:19:24 -0000

Subject: RE: [FTFB] FAQ request (was Re: [FTFB] NPV cost error in NSL BDN?)

> Can the FAQman please add a

WILCO

From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>

Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 22:02:36 +0100

Subject: Re: [FTFB] FAQ request (was Re: [FTFB] NPV cost error in NSL BDN?)

> -MWS- wrote:

> > Have you included the fighter group cost in your calculation? The

> Ahhhh. That makes sense, but is *NOT* obvious.

Hm. Well... that's kinda why the cost for all fighter types, *including* the
Standard fighters, are listed separately from the ship components
(particularly the fighter bay) in the Mass and Points Cost Table on p. 11
:-/

The big confuser is the Assault Transport on p. 42, which for some reason
*does* include its landing shuttles in the points cost!

Regards,