From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 21:20:23 +0100
Subject: Re: [FT] WotW - needlebeams
> Robertson, Brendan wrote: > Below is a commentary on the systems brought up & possible >balance Disagree. In my recorded playtest battles, all-arc 6mu-range weapons (PDS and scatterguns) have had non-PD targets almost exactly as often (per turn the weapon was operable) as 1-arc, range-12 weapons (Pulser-C-1s and MKPs). If that holds true for Needles as well (fairly likely but not certain, since the Needles are multi-shot and can never be distracted by point defence duties), an all-arc, 6mu-range Needle should have the *same* Mass as a normal, single-arc Needle... not 3.5 times more. Also from the recorded playtests, double the range band is worth ~3x the cost (at least for normal damage-inflicting weapons). Applying this to the Needles, an all-arc 12mu-range Needle should be ~3x as big as an all-arc 6mu-range Needle, which in turn is worth as much as the 1-arc 12mu-range Needle. The above proposal makes the 6-arc version 3.5x as big as the standard and the 5-arc one (which is effectively the same as a 6-arc if you don't use the (A)-arc fire optional rule) 3x as big. All in all, the above Mass scheme - Mass = 2 for a single-arc mount, +1 Mass for *each* extra arc - seems like it should balance OK. No, it wasn't me who thought it up originally :-/ Previously I thought that a multi-arc Needle would work with Pulser Mass, but that is too little. That idea was based on relative values of fire arcs for longer-ranged weapons, but those values don't work for short-ranged weapons. I hadn't looked carefully enough at how often PDSs got to fire at starships.:-( 'Course, then there's the question of whether or not the standard (1-arc) Needle beam is balanced against the normal "pure damage" weapons. Judging from the number of Needles present on the designs in my archive - currently 93 Needle beams spread over 36 different ship designs, out of over 1100 Human-tech designs - I'm not entirely certain it is. With the above Mass, the wide-arc versions should be just as underpowered as the 1-arc one though :-/ > Phalon Pulsar-N Comparing the cost of Pulsers with the cost of the above wide-arc Needles, an 1-arc Pulser is rather more expensive than an 1-arc Needle, a 3-arc Pulser marginally more expensive than a 3-arc Needle, and a 6-arc Pulser slightly less expensive than a 5-arc Needle (and a fair bit less expensive than a 6-arc one, but see the above note about (A)-arc fire). If any penalty is necessary (which I doubt), forbid an N-tuned Pulser to fire in PDS mode. Regards,