[FT] WotW #5: AFHAWKS End

7 posts ยท Mar 30 2001 to Mar 31 2001

From: Izenberg, Noam <Noam.Izenberg@j...>

Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 12:09:28 -0500

Subject: [FT] WotW #5: AFHAWKS End

Here's what I have for consensus on AFHAWKS. Let me know if this is
unsatisfactory:

AF-SMLs (or AFHAWKS) [BIF, GZG-LISTers] (24-Dec-00) WotW #5
Mass/Cost= 1/3
Effect: Vs. ships: None Vs. Fighters and missiles: as KV Scattergun Vs. PBs,
Roll D6 4, 5 knocks it down by 1 and 6 does 2 Range=6 MU, All arcs OR 9 MU in
arcs of SML.
Salvo type must be selected during order-writing phase. Fires in PDS
phase. Requires Firecon. Can fire as ADFC. PSB: Intercepts fighters with short
duration high accuracy drives and electronics. Light warhead is ineffective
vs. ships, but kills fighters effectively.

Variant interpretation has reduced effectiveness vs. missiles (50%), and
increased effectiveness vs. Heavy fighters (ingores heavy "screen" bonus).
AFHAWKS do not have to be selected during written orders, but salvo cant be
fired if launcher has fired other missile types during missile phase.

Comments: Weapon stats reflect WotW discussion.

From: Charles Taylor <charles.taylor@c...>

Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 21:22:35 +0100

Subject: Re: [FT] WotW #5: AFHAWKS End

In message <6B3C0EEAB4FED3119F5F009027DC5E9E01D72FA6@spacemsg3.jhuapl.edu>
> "Izenberg, Noam" <Noam.Izenberg@jhuapl.edu> wrote:

> Here's what I have for consensus on AFHAWKS. Let me know if this is
One question is that 'range 9 mu in 3 arcs of SML and range 6 mu in
other 3 arcs' or do we have to chose 9 mu + 3 arcs or 6 mu + 6 arcs when
we buy the weapon? (I hope thats clear).

> Salvo type must be selected during order-writing phase. Fires in PDS
bonus).
> AFHAWKS do not have to be selected during written orders, but salvo
Apart from my query looks fine.

From: Izenberg, Noam <Noam.Izenberg@j...>

Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:10:29 -0500

Subject: Re: [FT] WotW #5: AFHAWKS End

> From Charles:

> Range=6 MU, All arcs OR 9 MU in arcs of SML.
'
Half of one, six dozen of the other. The area of coverage is almost equal.
Pick one as your standard. I like the 6" all arc becasue its simpler. BIF
prefers the 9" 3-arc to (I think) keep it more SM-like and differentiate
it from the alien weapons. I personally hate having to track which arcs
fighters attack a ship from, preferring to think of the fighter assault (and
therefore any defensive fire) as a swarm or electron cloud around the target
ship.

From: Bif Smith <bif@b...>

Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 23:58:35 +0100

Subject: Re: [FT] WotW #5: AFHAWKS End

[quoted original message omitted]

From: Jason Weiser <atlas7d@e...>

Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:03:37 -0500

Subject: Re: [FT] WotW #5: AFHAWKS End

I have a good question, where on the web are all these WOtW weapons being kept
in their final form?

   Jason Weiser
[quoted original message omitted]

From: Bif Smith <bif@b...>

Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 11:29:33 +0100

Subject: Re: [FT] WotW #5: AFHAWKS End

[quoted original message omitted]

From: Charles Taylor <charles.taylor@c...>

Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 17:11:48 +0100

Subject: Re: [FT] WotW #5: AFHAWKS End

In message <005101c0b96c$f98abec0$60b6893e@inty>
> "Bif Smith" <bif@bifsmith.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
Um.. AFSMR racks - well, logically, in comparison with a regular SMR
(Mass 4) and a SML (Mass 3 + 2 per salvo) - yes, they should be Mass 3,
and presumably Cost 9.

If you use the 6-arc, range 6 mu version, it is functionally the same as
a Scattergun (Mass 1, Cost 5).

Just thought I'd point that out :-)