From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 23:47:49 -0500
Subject: [FT] Unbelievably BIG ship
Steve smirked: > Well, it took a long time to do, but it was worth it to see the look on Just out of curiosity, how did you define the scenario? "I'm going to bring two ships, and you bring everything you've got"? How did you sucker your opponent into this?
From: DracSpy@a...
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 23:57:48 EST
Subject: Re: [FT] Unbelievably BIG ship
In a message dated 99-01-10 23:48:53 EST, you write: << Just out of curiosity, how did you define the scenario? "I'm going to bring two ships, and you bring everything you've got"? How did you sucker your opponent into this? >> Something like that, it chose a fleet of, I think that is was ~1M points and they fight till one side retreats. Technicaly I lost, but on a mass per mass base I won. Alto I don't think I'm going to take another Mega Gun Carrier (MGC) into battle. -Adm. Sir Stephen F. Kaylee
From: Magnus Alexandersson <m96maal@m...>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 15:52:39 +0100 (MET)
Subject: Re: [FT] Unbelievably BIG ship
> On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Los wrote: Tell that to Saddam.....
From: Los <los@c...>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 09:08:25 -0800
Subject: Re: [FT] Unbelievably BIG ship
> DracSpy@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 99-01-10 23:48:53 EST, you write: I think it would be fun...And by the way, one of the classic scenarios of Science Fiction. But then again in my view, balanced scenarios are boring, I think it's cool to labor under some disadvantage. How many real life battles are balanced?
From: Los <los@c...>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:21:24 -0800
Subject: Re: [FT] Unbelievably BIG ship
> Magnus Alexandersson wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Los wrote: