FT-Targeting beacons

2 posts ยท Feb 5 2001 to Feb 5 2001

From: Bif Smith <bif@b...>

Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 16:46:38 -0000

Subject: FT-Targeting beacons

This is the bif again, wanting comments on a idea I had a while ago (marker by
*), but heard nothing about.I`ve had a free day, and been going through the
old posts, reraising old ideas, and asking for comments. You can probably
guess from the number of posts from me
today?<G>.

Chris DeBoe said-

> Oerjan's suggestion was that 3 mass is a banzai jammer: Hull 1, armor

This has raised a idea or two-

*Targeting beacon Replaces standard SML round (mass=2) Range=ER SML (got to
have some advantages for no dammage) Cost=x4 Dammage=none, instead, any
round(s) that suvive PDS lock a homing beacon onto the hull of the ship
targeted. This beacon allows any SML fired at the
ship with the beacon to gain a +1 to the number of missiles to hit role,
and
also bypassed the "banzai jammer" and/or the target the nearest ship.
Effect negated by ECM (indevidual or area).

Also, watching gundam (General Non Discontinuaty Armuored Mobile suit) raised
another idea, instead of using banzai jammers, how about using *inflateable
ballons that mimic the outline of the ship, and emmit a signiture that
confuses the target sensors of the missiles. This device would only work with
the use of ECM, to degrage the sensors on the missiles. The mass of the decoys
would be 2, the cost would be 5, and carries 3 decoys (only one launched at
once). Cost and mass only a guess at the moment.

Comments? or arguments anyone?

From: Charles Taylor <charles.taylor@c...>

Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 23:16:36 GMT

Subject: Re: FT-Targeting beacons

In message <000501c08fa5$1c290500$17c2893e@inty>
> "Bif Smith" <bif@bifsmith.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:

> This is the bif again, wanting comments on a idea I had a while ago
Effect
> negated by ECM (indevidual or area).

Is that +1 if any get through, or +1 _per_ beacon that gets through?