From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 12:33:50 -0500
Subject: [FT] ST Alternatives Re: [FT]Star Trek rules - BIG thanks
David: *** Yes, the Micromachine constitutions are the right scales, but most of the rest of their ships aren't. The defiant is too big (as is voyager). The excelsior is too small. The galaxy is WAY too small. The ambassador is way too small, etc. There is no consistency. *** Well, there is consistency: they all take up about the same space in an MM package. ;->= Beyond that, I'd point out that even GZG-FT figs break down here and there; I have trouble imagining 24 of the fighters fitting in almost any carrier(the NSL big T is one HONKER) and still have room for the crew, weapons, power plants, etc., indicated. Flying an MM Galaxy next to an MM Excelsior is a bit jarring, but I can live with it. Putting a six-plus inch ship amongst the less than three inchers, unless it's a juggernaught in a mostly straight line across the table, seems a bit awkward. I just wish they didn't WARP so easily, and I don't mean go to translight. Giving differences in peoples' tolerences to visual conundrums and desires for ease-of-play, it's a very big YMMV. Oh, just saw your post on the piccies. BIG thanks! I recognized one of the Jovian Chronicles ships, but not the other one. As an aside, I've been noticing the resin ships on eBay you mentioned; glad I didn't get in your way. ;->= Don: *** > I talked Drew Bergstrom into making the Falcon Frigate *** You have my thanks! I don't know if anyone agreed to the Maquis ship as the Fed fighter, but I'd like it. Likewise, a Jem Ha'dar would make my day. I have GOT to get that man some money!(Yes, you've heard THAT before.)