From: KH.Ranitzsch@t... (K.H.Ranitzsch)
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 21:04:36 +0200
Subject: Re: [FT] Single-shot Fighter combat
[quoted original message omitted]
[FT] Single-shot Fighter combat
From: Brian Bilderback <bbilderback@h...>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 12:55:26 -0700
Subject: Re: [FT] Single-shot Fighter combat
> From: KH.Ranitzsch@t-online.de (K.H.Ranitzsch) > Sounds reasonable PSB-wise, just one missile load/energy charge big That's what I thought too. > Can't comment on the balance issue The more I think about it, the more merit it has, although I don't know if it addresses the need to make SMALL numbers of fighters viable. It definitely curtails the locustiness of large swarms of fighters, and it really cramps Soapbubbles, since if a carrier can't survive long enough to rearm its fighters, those fighters are useless against anything but other fighters. 3B^2
From: Robertson, Brendan <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 10:19:10 +1000
Subject: RE: [FT] Single-shot Fighter combat
On Friday, May 10, 2002 5:55 AM, Brian Bilderback > [SMTP:bbilderback@hotmail.com] wrote: > it addresses the need to make SMALL numbers of fighters viable. It > rearm its fighters, those fighters are useless against anything but If you're only bringing one squadron, you just make them Torp/Attack fighters. It has a meaningful damage result if you don't expect enemy fighters.