FT: sensors

6 posts ยท Jan 31 2000 to Jan 31 2000

From: GBailey@a...

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 08:54:07 EST

Subject: FT: sensors

Are Active sensors 360 degrees?

Can fighters make any sort of identification before making an attack? (I
recently was in a battle when the enemy's 24 torpedo fighters attacked my
smallest ship not knowing anything about my fleet composition)

Can a capital ship, which gets 3 sensor rolls, target an object for 2 or 3
rolls in the same turn? Or must it choose a different target for each roll?

Glen

From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <schoon@a...>

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 09:19:05 -0800

Subject: Re: FT: sensors

> Are Active sensors 360 degrees?

> From MT - Yes.

> Can fighters make any sort of identification before making an attack?

I would say yes. They would have the same range as passive sensors.

> Can a capital ship, which gets 3 sensor rolls, target an object for 2

Sure, but they must all be allocated in advance - before rolling.

From: John Leary <john_t_leary@y...>

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 09:56:03 -0800

Subject: Re: FT: sensors

> GBailey@aol.com wrote:
XXX If your ships were in sensor range, he should have been able to
know the mass of the your ships.   JTL
XXX
> Can a capital ship, which gets 3 sensor rolls, target an object for 2
XXX House rules. One sensor roll is allowed per FCS on the searching ship. Any
ship within sensor range is able to be scanned. XXX

Bye for now,

From: Thomas Anderson <thomas.anderson@u...>

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 19:54:18 +0000 (GMT)

Subject: Re: FT: sensors

> On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Sean Bayan Schoonmaker wrote:

> >Can fighters make any sort of identification before making an attack?

or possibly less; a fighter carries a smaller sensor array than a ship, even
though there may be 6 in a group (and hence interferometry, synthetic
apertures and that). passive sensors but with half the range?

tom

From: Thomas Anderson <thomas.anderson@u...>

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 19:55:47 +0000 (GMT)

Subject: Re: FT: sensors

> On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, John Leary wrote:

> GBailey@aol.com wrote:

only if he had enh/sup sensors and scanned them all first. as far as i
can tell, basic sensors just get the actual mini put on the table, not any
hard data. of course, i could have missed something (i read the MT sensor
rules a few days ago, but very quickly).

tom

From: Michael T Miserendino <MTMiserendino@l...>

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 15:12:00 -0500

Subject: Re: FT: sensors

Michael Miserendino Senior Software Engineer Lincoln Re mtmiserendino@lnc.com

> owner-gzg-l@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU at internet 01/31/00 02:54PM >>>

> >Can fighters make any sort of identification before making an attack?

> or possibly less; a fighter carries a smaller sensor array than a ship,

I have experimented with this quite a bit and found that using a shorter

range than ships works well to balance between supposedly less powerful sensor
packages than a ship and the far reaching range of the fighter.