[FT] Purty Pictures and Starhunter?

4 posts ยท Nov 23 2003 to Nov 23 2003

From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>

Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 13:17:30 -0600

Subject: Re: [FT] Purty Pictures and Starhunter?

> Wierdly, I got nothing on the gallery page, least images, but plenty
...
> I've got a quibble with this one:

> It looks gorgeous, but why oh why is the landing bay right next to the

I still don't see the images as thumbnails, but I get to the link above. Must
be my silly phobia of Javascript.

Definitely looks like something that should have been a catamaran.

Speaking of cat's, has anyone been watching Star Hunter(spacing?)? I caught
part of one show last night, and while neither the plot nor the acting
appealed to me, the little space battle was very pleasing, and the rusty ol'
liner being used by the main actors was rather fetching.

The_Beast

From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>

Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 15:09:36 -0600

Subject: Re: [FT] Purty Pictures and Starhunter?

<snip>
> I've got a quibble with this one:
<snip>

Okay, enlighten this tread head, why is this bad? What disaster?

Gracias,

From: Roger Burton West <roger@f...>

Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 21:49:08 +0000

Subject: Re: [FT] Purty Pictures and Starhunter?

> On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 03:09:36PM -0600, warbeads@juno.com wrote:

> Okay, enlighten this tread head, why is this bad? What disaster?

It is conceivable that one might wish to launch or recover ships while the
spinal mount is in operation.

R

From: Ray Forsythe <erf2@g...>

Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 18:49:16 -0500

Subject: Re: [FT] Purty Pictures and Starhunter?

> Roger Burton West wrote:

That and the potential for a docking mishap to smack right into the main

armament.