[FT] Professionalism and Quality Results

3 posts ยท Jan 17 2000 to Jan 19 2000

From: Beth Fulton <beth.fulton@m...>

Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:21:15 +1000

Subject: [FT] Professionalism and Quality Results

G'day guys,

OK sample size ain't great on this, but here's teh results as they currently
stand (for all those who're interested).

Cheers

Beth

> [quoted text omitted]
Min = minimum score anyone gave them Max = maximum score anyone gave them Mode
= most common score Mean = average score (rounded to 2 decimal place)

Nat = nation Stat = statistic CQ = Crew Quality LQ = Leader Quality P =
Professionalism VR = Vessel Reliability O = Opportunity useage

Nat Stat CQ LQ P VR O ESU Min 2 2 2 2 1 Max 3 5 3 4 4 Mode 2 3 3 3 2 Mean 2.3
2.9 2.6 2.9 2.4 FCT Min 3 2 2 2 2 Max 4 5 5 4 5 Mode 3 3 3 4 4 Mean 3.3 3.3
3.3 3.3 3.6 FSE Min 3 3 3 3 3 Max 4 5 4 5 4 Mode 3 3 3 3 3 Mean 3.4 3.8 3.4
3.6 3.3 IC Min 2 2 1 2 1 Max 4 3 3 5 4 Mode 2 3 1 2 2 Mean 2.3 2.5 1.7 2.5 2.7
IF Min 1 1 2 2 2 Max 3 4 3 3 4 Mode 2 2 2 3 3 Mean 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.7 JAP Min
2 2 1 4 2 Max 5 5 5 5 4 Mode 4 3 4 5 2 Mean 3.6 3.5 3.4 4.8 2.9 LLAR Min 2 2 2
2 1 Max 3 3 3 3 3 Mode 2 3 2 3 3 Mean 2.3 2.7 2.4 2.6 2.6 KNG Min 3 3 3 3 2
Max 4 5 4 4 3 Mode 3 3 3 3 3 Mean 3.3 3.7 3.3 3.4 2.9 NAC Min 3 2 3 2 1 Max 5
4 5 5 4 Mode 4 4 4 5 4 Mean 4 3.4 4 3.6 3.1 NI Min 4 3 4 3 3 Max 5 4 5 5 5
Mode 4 4 4 4 4 Mean 4.4 3.6 4.4 4.3 4 NSL Min 3 3 2 3 3 Max 5 5 5 5 5 Mode 4 4
4 5 3 Mean 4 3.9 3.9 4.3 3.6 OU Min 3 3 3 2 2 Max 5 5 5 5 4 Mode 4 4 4 3 4
Mean 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.6 3.4 PAU Min 1 2 1 2 1 Max 2 3 3 3 4 Mode 2 2 2 2 3 Mean
1.9 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.7 RH Min 1 2 2 2 2 Max 4 4 4 4 4 Mode 2 2 3 3 3 Mean 2.4 2.7
2.7 2.9 2.8 SWISS Min 2 2 1 2 1 Max 5 5 5 5 4 Mode 3 3 3 5 3 Mean 3 3.1 3 4.1
2.9 UNSC Min 3 1 1 3 1 Max 5 5 5 5 4 Mode 3 3 5 5 4 Mean 3.8 2.9 3.6 4.5 2.6
OTHER - non-canon or single responses

SK 4 2 3 2 3
ITT-std         2       2       4       3       4
ITT- anti-pirate        4       4       4       3       4
FSU 3 3 4 2 4 GHURKA 3 3 3 3 2 IAS 4 3 4 4 4

From: Thomas Anderson <thomas.anderson@u...>

Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 00:19:01 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)

Subject: Re: [FT] Professionalism and Quality Results

> On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Beth Fulton wrote:

> OK sample size ain't great on this, but here's teh results as they

sort of webiffied (those who have reasons why not state so now or forever hold
your peace, etc) at:

http://members.xoom.com/gzg_l/beth-stats.html

praise to Beth, complaints to me (and the Narn Bat Squad, so watch it). i took
the means as the definitive values. medians would have been nice, though:).

a vote of thanks to Beth for cooking up this project!

tom

From: Beth Fulton <beth.fulton@m...>

Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 11:26:47 +1000

Subject: Re: [FT] Professionalism and Quality Results

G'day tom,

> OK sample size ain't great on this, but here's teh results as they

Thanks!

> i took the means as the definitive values. medians would have been

Well if you round the means to the nearest integer you get the medians... one
of the benefits of the small sample size and this particular data distribution
;)

> a vote of thanks to Beth for cooking up this project!

And more importantly thanks to all those who participated in what ever form or
fashion;)

Cheers

Beth