FT Political Geography

4 posts ยท Aug 31 1998 to Sep 1 1998

From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <schoon@a...>

Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 08:36:39 -0700

Subject: FT Political Geography


  

From: Niall Gilsenan <ngilsena@i...>

Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 19:03:26 +0100

Subject: Re: FT Political Geography

> At 08:36 31/08/98 -0700, you wrote:

The Kra'vak seem to be surround the entire human sphere!! Bad news indeed.
Where xactly would the Sa'vasku be located? I had the impression they were
somewhere between human and kra'vak space.

Good job in any case.

From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <schoon@a...>

Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1998 13:09:56 -0700

Subject: Re: FT Political Geography

> I really don't think that things will be as neat as Schoons map.

I agree entirely, Tony. I was just taking a shot at general areas.

From: Tony Wilkinson <twilko@o...>

Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1998 00:47:15 +0100

Subject: Re: FT Political Geography

I really don't think that things will be as neat as Schoons map. It might fit
for major areas of control but I think within those you are likely to find
bubbles (pockets, ballons, sectors etc..) of space controled by another power
or even a small nation like, heaven forbid, the Irish:). An area might be
nominally ESU space, but there might be 3 or 4 systems that were under NAC
control. A nice point to form up a fleet for a deep strike into enemy
territory. The map for the expansion campaign has a lot room for overlapping
areas of control. Such areas make for high tensions and lots of combat. Thats
my 2 cents worth.

Tony. twilko@ozemail.com.au

> At 08:36 31/08/98 -0700, you wrote: