FT Pilots & Officers

7 posts ยท Nov 27 1998 to Nov 30 1998

From: Denny Graver <den_den_den@t...>

Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 14:34:27 -0000

Subject: FT Pilots & Officers

I was thinking of naming the Squadron Leaders and Ship's Officers involved in
the Lafayette Campaign I'm running after list members, but then thought it
might not be fun to read your name as a casualty in a battle report without
warning. So to avoid any flaming or upset, if you'd like to have a place in
history, please let me know. It will only be in name only as
control of the NAC/ESU fleets (and their allies) will be by the players
involved. Obviously for security reasons I can't give out exact details, but
if your choice doesn't appear on the actual fleet listing of the NAC
 or
the ESU I'll assign you a post randomly unless you specify alternatives. The
AAR will appear for all to read at the conclusion of the campaign.

Officer for the NAC (Preferred Ship Class) Squadron Leader for the NAC
(Standard, Heavy, Fast, Intercept, Attack, Long Range or Torpedo)

Officer for the NSL(Preferred Ship Class) Squadron Leader for the NSL
(Standard, Heavy, Fast, Intercept, Attack, Long Range or Torpedo)

Officer for the ESU (Preferred Ship Class) Squadron Leader for the
ESU(Standard, Heavy, Fast, Intercept, Attack, Long Range or Torpedo)

Officer for the FSE(Preferred Ship Class) Squadron Leader for the FSE
(Standard, Heavy, Fast, Intercept, Attack, Long Range or Torpedo)

Cheers!:Tron

From: John Leary <john_t_leary@y...>

Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 11:59:38 -0800

Subject: Re: FT Pilots & Officers

> Tron wrote:

> Officer for the NAC (Preferred Ship Class)
     CA or CL
> Officer for the NSL(Preferred Ship Class)
     CA or DD

Thank you, (I think)
:-)
Bye for now,

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>

Date: Sat, 28 Nov 1998 09:09:45 -0800

Subject: Re: FT Pilots & Officers

> Tron wrote:

> Officer for the NAC (Preferred Ship Class)

Well, if you have any boarding actions, put me down as the leader of the force
from one of these two.

Otherwise any cruiser or capital from these two.

From: Thomas Barclay <Thomas.Barclay@s...>

Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 23:27:32 -0500

Subject: Re: FT Pilots & Officers

John spake thusly upon matters weighty:

I'm thinking if you have a sense of humor, making John an FSE Admiral would be
quite funny (or at least John's reaction would be!). (ROTFL)

Tom.

> Tron wrote:

From: Brian Burger <yh728@v...>

Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 21:13:56 -0800 (PST)

Subject: Re: FT Pilots & Officers

> On Mon, 30 Nov 1998, John M. Atkinson wrote:

> Thomas Barclay wrote:
(ROTFL)
> You're coming down for GZG-ECC, right? And even if not, I can find

This might be overkill, John. I mean, pushing your "French" button wasn't very
nice, but you'd actually inflict American beer on someone, for any reason?

The Geneva Convention might have something to say about it...

Old Good Joke: How are American beer & making out in a canoe similar? They're
both f***ing close to water...

ObGZG: Giving John an FSE command would be counter-productive - the
self-destruct mechanisms on allthe FSE ships would mysteriously go
off...

(I think the good Canadian beer I'm drinking might have influenced the above
email...)

From: Michael Brown <mwbrown@s...>

Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 21:23:42 -0800

Subject: RE: FT Pilots & Officers

Pabst!

[quoted original message omitted]

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>

Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 00:57:01 -0800

Subject: Re: FT Pilots & Officers

> Thomas Barclay wrote: