[FT] non-FTL Carrier

2 posts · Jan 29 2002 to Jan 29 2002

From: KH.Ranitzsch@t... (K.H.Ranitzsch)

Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 07:34:49 +0100

Subject: Re: [FT] non-FTL Carrier

[quoted original message omitted]

From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>

Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:53:25 -0500

Subject: Re: [FT] non-FTL Carrier

> At 7:34 AM +0100 1/29/02, K.H.Ranitzsch wrote:
They
> could also be old vessels whose FTL drive isn't worth repairing.

And likely many others. Given the amount of resources that go into supporting
a terrestrial weter navy carrier, a small colony won't be given much good if
in the form of a CVL even sans an FTL.