From: Izenberg, Noam <Noam.Izenberg@j...>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 08:53:51 -0400
Subject: [FT] NI fleet design questions
Now I'm getting down to some individual questions. The Yerushalayim heavy Cruiser, as it is now, has a "primary" configuration and three alternate refits. The primary has an FH mounted P-torp as the heavy weapon, and the refits replace that (and a few other weapons with a B3, or a LRPT (F) or a Graser 2 (F). I have two questions 1) As is, the 3-row CH has 25 Hull+ 5 armor, which makes it stronger hulled than the FSE Jerez and UNSC River, but weaker than the NAC Vandenburg, The ESU Voroshilev, and the NSL Markgraf are also stronger, but they traded Main Drive for it. I could knock out a B2 on the Yerushalayim for +1 Hull and +1Armor. Or should I leave it as is - on the weaker side As is, assuming average damage (i.e. no huge armor skipping rerolls): Ship Thresh1 Thresh2 NAC-Van 11 17 (screen) NSL-Mark 12-17 23 (has so much armor it is likely to last past thresh1 FSE-Jer 7 14 ESU-Vor 11 17 (screen) UN-River 9 18 NI-Yer 14 22 This seems to argue for keeping it as-is. (I know that thresh 3 and kill-damage (which are one and the same for 3-row hulls) are complicating factors, but most ships' effective battle-life does not often extend past thresh 3 at this size an smaller). 2) Given that Torps (and LRPT's) are probably the "main" heavy weapon of NI, should the "primary" configuration of the Yerushalayim (and heavier) be the LRPT version? The reason I'm semi-inclined toward this is guidance by the mini itself. FT1508 and larger almost all have a large underslung F facing "barrel" suggesting a nice heavy weapon. I know we're not supposed to get too tied up in the minis themselves when designing stats, but it's pretty prominent in the NI ships. Think of the question this way - since only one version would likely go in a Fleet Book, and the other(s) described in the flavor text, is it better "color" for NI to have: 4 Class 2 Beam Batteries (F/FP/AP, F/FS/AS, 2x all arcs) 1 Pulse Torpedo (FP/F/FS) or 4 Class 2 Beam Batteries (2xAP/FP/F, 2xF/FS/AS) 1 Long Range Pulse Torpedo (F) The standard P-torp is a bit more versatile, and the LRPT is a bit more "specialized" The same (Torp vs. LRPT) question applies to the Barak Bttlecruiser and Ben Gurion SDN All thoughts appreciated.