From: Donald Hosford <hosford.donald@a...>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:17:30 -0400
Subject: [FT]Near Future Equipment
Has anyone done any "near future" ship equipment. (ie: done up some rules for handling near future combat? Say 2020-2060...
From: Donald Hosford <hosford.donald@a...>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:17:30 -0400
Subject: [FT]Near Future Equipment
Has anyone done any "near future" ship equipment. (ie: done up some rules for handling near future combat? Say 2020-2060...
From: Donald Hosford <hosford.donald@a...>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:35:55 -0400
Subject: Re: [FT]Near Future Equipment
> Donald Hosford wrote: > Has anyone done any "near future" ship equipment. (ie: done up some
From: Jason Stephensen <J.Stephensen@m...>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 14:42:13 +1000
Subject: Re: [FT]Near Future Equipment
> At 12:35 AM 4/15/99 -0400, you wrote: Was there ever a period of peace during the time? I mean aren't their border skirmishes, raids, minor acts of war pretty much going on all the time? I was under the impression that there has pretty much been no period of peace in entirity during the whole time scale.
From: Donald Hosford <hosford.donald@a...>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:58:47 -0400
Subject: Re: [FT]Near Future Equipment
> Jason Stephensen wrote: > >Was there any fighting in the official history from 2020 - 2070 or
From: Jerry Han <jhan@w...>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 01:38:14 -0400
Subject: Re: [FT]Near Future Equipment
> Donald Hosford wrote: Have you looked at Keith Watt's Solar Thrust rules? It's not based on the GZG timeline, but it's a good universe, and the rules are perfect for those reality monkeys out there. (8-) Now, if somebody could provide the link for the site... though I suppose I could just look it up in the Archives myself. Gah. Need sleep. (8-) J.
From: Donald Hosford <hosford.donald@a...>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 01:57:47 -0400
Subject: Re: [FT]Near Future Equipment
> Jerry Han wrote: > Donald Hosford wrote: No weapons except the ones in the books. > Now, if somebody could provide the link for the site... though I (8-) > J.
From: Keith Watt <kwatt@a...>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 09:12:50 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Subject: Re: [FT]Near Future Equipment
> On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Donald Hosford wrote: > Jerry Han wrote: My original purpose for Solar Thrust was to provide a hard-science setting for Full Thrust, hence I just specified which weapons were unphysical rather than create new ones. But in truth, FT the weaponry isn't bad. With 1 MU = 80 km, you can use lasers as energy weapons and of course missiles will always be important weapon systems. I have roughed out, but not written, an article on near-future weaponry and will put it up eventually, but other than particle accelerators, mass drivers, lasers (of various wavelengths), and missiles, these's not much more I see in my crystal ball by 2063. I plan to do some energy delivered/damage calculations, but really the FT rules are fine - there's not much need for new rules that not everyone will agree on. That said, Solar Thrust is fast being expanded into a full independent strategic, tactical, and roleplaying (!) game, and so I will probably write some rules based on the calculations hinted at above. The URL for the site is:
From: Donald Hosford <hosford.donald@a...>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 03:17:50 -0400
Subject: Re: [FT]Near Future Equipment
> Keith Watt wrote: > On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Donald Hosford wrote: