From: Paul Radford <paulradford@i...>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 22:14:27 -0000
Subject: (FT) NAC 23rd Raider Group
Hi, the homepages of the NAC 23rd Raider Group (Fifth Fleet) are now open. Please take a look if you should feel inclined at:
From: Paul Radford <paulradford@i...>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 22:14:27 -0000
Subject: (FT) NAC 23rd Raider Group
Hi, the homepages of the NAC 23rd Raider Group (Fifth Fleet) are now open. Please take a look if you should feel inclined at:
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 19:25:04 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: (FT) NAC 23rd Raider Group
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Tom Anderson wrote: > what's the fourth C in C4I, then? i've heard of C3I, but i suppose i'm C3I is Command Control Communications and Intel. The 4th C is Computer AI's and such.
From: Thomas Anderson <thomas.anderson@u...>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 00:27:00 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
Subject: Re: (FT) NAC 23rd Raider Group
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Paul Radford wrote: > the homepages of the NAC 23rd Raider Group (Fifth Fleet) are now open. that would be: http://www.innotts.co.uk/~paulradford/gaming/ft/23rd.html "During sustained combat operations, the 23rd Raider Group is tasked with penetrating enemy territory for strikes against C4I facilities and military infrastructure elements." what's the fourth C in C4I, then? i've heard of C3I, but i suppose i'm behind the times again. or does C4I just go one louder?:) tom ps speaking of going one louder, anyone remember Public Enemy releasing an album in 'MP4' format? nice work!:)
From: Paul Radford <paulradford@i...>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:57:49 -0000
Subject: Re: (FT) NAC 23rd Raider Group
> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 00:27:00 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) Well technically, that's correct but then visitors would miss the resources sections should it be useful to anyone. > what's the fourth C in C4I, then? i've heard of C3I, but i suppose i'm > From: Ryan M Gill <monty@arcadia.turner.com> > C3I is Command Control Communications and Intel. The 4th C is Computer Ahhh beaten to the point by Ryan's faster access to his 4th C. Cheers,
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 17:53:59 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: (FT) NAC 23rd Raider Group
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Paul Radford wrote: > >C3I is Command Control Communications and Intel. The 4th C is We NAC Information Warfare Specialists are very attached to our fourth C. Its one very good way to keep the frogs, fuzzies, Johnnie Arabs and charlies from getting a leg up on you. Besides its fun to constantly insert nasty little viruses and logic bombs into their systems to keep their AI's on the verge of breakdown and rather manic in behavior...
From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 19:38:07 -0500
Subject: Re: (FT) NAC 23rd Raider Group
Ryan Gill burbled: > We NAC Information Warfare Specialists are very attached to our "Oh dear, is _that_ why we sent an agent to insert Lesath's Syndrome virus into the water system of New Ottawa? You know, I thought that AI was acting a little peculiar, lately. Fortunately it all worked out well enough." Making an Islamic Fed AI more manic and unstable is probably not a very good idea at all.
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 19:40:50 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: (FT) NAC 23rd Raider Group
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Laserlight harranged: > "Oh dear, is _that_ why we sent an agent to insert Lesath's well, between you and I, we already had the population innoculated. Thats why we had your AI put resources into the project. BTW, did you like the the "data" the agent brought back? > Making an Islamic Fed AI more manic and unstable is probably not Sure, but if it starts to act like the computer in Paranoia, its better for your enemies...Trust the computer, the computer is your friend, trust noone else. Do you really think a computer that beleives it is the Voice of Allah is going to be good for an Islamic State's tactics. The Mosque Police would have kittens or perhaps kids (of the goat variety).
From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 20:52:54 -0500
Subject: Re: (FT) NAC 23rd Raider Group
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Laserlight harrangued: Rather a risky way to handle things, don't you think? "We didn't have any Lesath's in stock, so we substituted Cytherian plague," for example. Or "we couldn't get the plans for the water plant, so we just had a suicide bomber set off a nuke in the city center." BTW, according to Brassey's book on camouflage, one of the Islamic states--I think Iran but I'm not sure of that--has a separate uniform pattern for suicide commandos. Kind of disturbing. > Making an Islamic Fed AI more manic and unstable is probably You don't think the Islamic Fed has enough Natural Intelligences who think they're the Voice of Allah? You want to add more sociopaths to the mix?
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 20:57:04 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: (FT) NAC 23rd Raider Group
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Laserlight wrote: > Rather a risky way to handle things, don't you think? "We Ahh, you just don't understand the NAC. Don't your realize that BB-CNN is really just a pawn of the NAC and those news reports you've been hearing were all just propaganda? > BTW, according to Brassey's book on camouflage, one of the Makes it easy for our SAS and Ranger snipers to figure out who to nail first. > You don't think the Islamic Fed has enough Natural Intelligences Do more sociopaths sound like they'd be more efficient? Balkanizing the IF would help, not hurt.
From: Thomas Anderson <thomas.anderson@u...>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 00:15:04 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
Subject: Re: (FT) NAC 23rd Raider Group
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Paul Radford wrote:
> >Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 00:27:00 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
well, the URL you posted was incorrect anyway - it had a slash instead
of
a stop ("ft/html"); i fixed the typo and then decided to change what it
linked to, as well; just goes to show, a copy editor should edit copy, not
content:).
tom
From: Thomas Anderson <thomas.anderson@u...>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 00:19:00 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
Subject: Re: (FT) NAC 23rd Raider Group
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Ryan M Gill wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Paul Radford wrote: there's probably a quote in there somewhere: "the Royal Navy is concerned with exercising control over four sees: the north sea, the mediterranean sea, the arctic see and the fourth see."; of course, it only works if spoken. and don't nobody make no jokes about 'the holy see', neither. wiseguys. > Besides its fun to constantly insert nasty little viruses and logic i should imagine that working with humans would do that anyway. especially if they're French:). tom