[FT] HH masses (was: Stardestroyer Stats)

2 posts · Mar 6 2002 to Mar 6 2002

From: Robertson, Brendan <Brendan.Robertson@d...>

Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 15:15:17 +1100

Subject: RE: [FT] HH masses (was: Stardestroyer Stats)

On Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:08 PM, Roger Books
[SMTP:books@jumpspace.net]
wrote:
> On 5-Mar-02 at 23:01, Ryan Gill (rmgill@mindspring.com) wrote:

Theres a good indication of what (mostly) works on my page at (ta dah!):
http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernskies/fthome.htm

Treating them as fighters, you get a reasonable scale in.

From: Brian Bilderback <bbilderback@h...>

Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 06:23:06 -0800

Subject: RE: [FT] HH masses (was: Stardestroyer Stats)

> Brendan Robertson wrote:

> Treating them as fighters, you get a reasonable scale in.

OK, I see where your error in thinking is.... *chuckle* You were trying to be
REASONABLE..... Ah, the follies of the innocent.......

2B^2