[FT] FTSR alterations

> bif smith wrote:

> I`m thinking of altering some submisions to the ftsr, and want to ask

Clarification: when BIF says "plasma guns", he means FB1's pulse torps rather
than the Starfire plasma guns. The Starfire (3rd edition) plasma
guns are short-ranged but *extremely* nasty within that range, and also
have a very significant anti-fighter firepower.

> 8x3 arc plasma guns (torps), mass=48, cost=144

240 pts.

> I`m asking for opinons about using plusers with only Cl.1 range (not

The novel in question being Weber/White's "In Death Ground".

In the novel, the Pg2 (2nd generation Plasma Gun, using the Starfire
notation) was quite effective indeed against fighters - in fact, if you
want "historical" anti-fighter efficiencies for the Acids (measured in
fighter kills per Mass compared to what point defence manages), each
all-arc pulser needs 2-3 PDS dice rather than just 1. Each extra PDS
die should increase the cost of the Pulser by ~1xMass.

> *I`m working from memory, and think it`s 4 mass for 6 arc.

Correct.

> Anybody want to get close to this thing (72 die at once?).

No more than the Allies wanted to during ISW-4. "Historically" (ie. in
the novel) most Acids were destroyed by long-range fire before getting
into Pg2 range, though :-/

Regards,

Oerjan Ohlson oerjan.ohlson@telia.com

"Life is like a sewer. What you get out of it, depends on what you put into
it."
- Hen3ry
From - Fri Dec 22 21:59:39 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
        by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA29015;
        Sun, 17 Dec 2000 14:53:50 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
        by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eBHKqEt50196;
        Sun, 17 Dec 2000 12:52:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Sun, 17 Dec
2000 12:52:14 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
        by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBHKqDm50174
        for gzg-l-outgoing; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 12:52:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:CiEOvmsIZSxJtlUO+itWp+GwdWjXh6nZ@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
        by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eBHKqBP50169
        for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 12:52:11
-0800 (PST)
Received: from eve.speakeasy.net (eve.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.17])
        by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eBHKqBf58363
        for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 12:52:11 -0800
(PST)
        (envelope-from maserati@flash.net)
Received: from [64.81.48.31] (dsl081-048-031-sea1.dsl-isp.net
[64.81.48.31])
        by eve.speakeasy.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id eBHKmNp30785
        for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 12:48:27 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: maserati@pop.flash.net
Message-Id: <p04330103b662c82fb3f8@[64.81.48.31]>
In-Reply-To:
 <417DEC289A05D4118408000102362E0A34D1D8@host-253.bitheads.com>
References:
 <417DEC289A05D4118408000102362E0A34D1D8@host-253.bitheads.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 12:47:28 -0700
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
From: Michael Llaneza <maserati@flash.net>
Subject: Re:Satellite imagery
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de000008e6

These would be perfect for tactical maps. I suspect these could be pasted
directly into the Close Combat series of WWII computer game (the SG2 types
should like the CC series).

Or for a con, enlarge 'em and print 'em out, and place your terrain on the
photo.

> \At 3:38 PM -0500 12/17/00, Barclay, Tom wrote:

--

Michael Carter Llaneza
Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1991-1950

Devolution is very real to me.

Whenever I hear the "Odd Couple" theme, I get this image of Dennis Rodman
borrowing Marge Schott's toothbrush.
From - Fri Dec 22 21:59:38 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
        by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA26025;
        Sun, 17 Dec 2000 14:37:57 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
        by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eBHKclW50049;
        Sun, 17 Dec 2000 12:38:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Sun, 17 Dec
2000 12:38:38 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
        by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBHKcbN50027
        for gzg-l-outgoing; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 12:38:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:Svk5+W/rCu+jpTtg9KsauobX2Hwm8y0W@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
        by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eBHKcZP50022
        for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 12:38:35
-0800 (PST)
Received: from exsrv.bitheads.com (mail.bitheads.com [64.26.142.194])
        by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eBHKcYf56841
        for <GZG-L@csua.berkeley.edu>; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 12:38:35 -0800
(PST)
        (envelope-from tomb@bitheads.com)
Received: by host-253.bitheads.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2448.0)
        id <YM7VRF3M>; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 15:38:27 -0500
Message-ID:
<417DEC289A05D4118408000102362E0A34D1D8@host-253.bitheads.com>
From: "Barclay, Tom" <tomb@bitheads.com>
To: "Gzg Digest (E-mail)" <GZG-L@csua.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Satellite imagery
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 15:38:20 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de000008e5

I hear tell the US has just quietly allowed one of their corps to sell 0.5m
resolution images from satellites.

As a wargamer, I'm all in favour of this. Undoubtedly, there are a thousand
reasons why a gov't with hi-res image-on-demand capacity might be
fearsome, but not much one can do about that.

http://www4.ncsu.edu/~pdbaylie/washmon.png

The above is a link to a picture at 1m resolution. Tell me that isn't an
awesome way to make a realistic battle map for SG2 or DS2? Half meter would be
even better. If we could get shots of the typical terrain in various areas or
urban layouts, one could use these as models for terrain in scenarios.

Pretty neat, in a vaguely scary way.