FT Campaign System 2 [Long]

> Ground Force Factor (GFF) = the basic unit for ground combat, equal to

That's a bit small--maybe a company instead?
> Resources will not always produce the same yield. Some months

Is this realistic? You may not know exactly how much you'll get but I wouldn't
expect tax revenue to vary that much.

> The points may be used on any turn to discover orders given in a

How about using it on counterintelligence?

Animosity Dice: If the rolling total rises above certain
> thresholds, actions must be taken within the ensuing Economic Turn.

How about required actions for negative numbers? During the Falklands War, the
US pretty much had to support Britain instead of UK due to public opinion.

> With very few exceptions, all units must have orders on every

needs more definition, I think

I like the Special Ops Teams but think you should have to buy normal troops
first, to recruit your SpecOps troops from.

> Ground Force Factor (GFF) = the basic unit for ground combat, equal

Yeah, it is sort of small, but that makes it dovetail into the FT related
troop rules really nicely.

> Resources will not always produce the same yield. Some months

Actually, I think that it does. The US budgetary surplus right now is because
of an unexpected tax windfall (along with the general economy). Russia's tax
income depends greatly on how much the taxed feel like paying (the big boys
that is), and how "stern" the government is willing to be with them.

> The points may be used on any turn to discover orders given in a

That could be a little too complex.

> Animosity Dice: If the rolling total rises above certain

Good point.

> With very few exceptions, all units must have orders on every

True, but play the game, not the rule. (I can't believe I just said that.) I
think that the spirit of the rule should be evident.

> I like the Special Ops Teams but think you should have to buy normal

Possibly, but we're dealing with abstracts here, and I think the eventual
result from making it a two step process would be similar to the one step way,
but only adding complexity.

Thank you very much for the comments. Keep 'em coming!