From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:58:27 -0600
Subject: Re: [FT] AAR and Re: RE-[FT] Starfire...
*** > Now B may use secondary movement to disengage from the dogfight. >If No, the other way around: A gets a free shot at B. The side which does *not* disengage gets a free shot at the side which does disengage. [snip] > If Group B reenters a dogfight with group B, all fire in the dogfight Group B dogfights itself? <g> Should be "If Group A reenters..." *** It's becoming hilariously obvious just how often I'm filtering out typoes. 'I knew what they meant.' Not that I don't depend on other folks to occasionally mind-read my posts, of course. *** Here's an odd thing, though: If there's only *one* squadron per side in the dogfight, they fire simultaneously according to FT2 p.17. However, if at least one side has *more* than one squadron involved in the same furball, the sides take turns firing one squadron at a time and apply the damage immediately(...) *** Funny, I thought it was on purpose. I know I've not been in many large furballs, and assumed the far more common mano y mano, or squadron y squadron, would be run faster/simpler. I don't have the book handy; how is order worked? Numerically superior shoots first? How about if dead even? Course, at this point, I'm expecting to hear how everyone else ALWAYS has multi-squadron dogfights... *** The Bugs didn't use SBMHAWKs in IDG. *** Funny, if this were another list to which I subscribe, Legends of Galactic Heroes, we'd be hearing spoiler-warning calls. ;->= Course, as you know, I won't read IDG until it's finished, and none of us should be holding our breaths. Last word from Baen on Sept 22? *sigh* The_Beast -Douglas J. Evans, curmudgeon One World, one Web, one Program - Microsoft promotional ad