[FT] a "true Fisher Battlecruiser" for the NAC, was Battlecruisers vs. battleships

3 posts · May 17 2002 to May 18 2002

Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 02:38:10 +0100

Subject: Re: Re: [FT] a "true Fisher Battlecruiser" for the NAC, was Battlecruisers vs. battleships

[quoted original message omitted]

From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>

Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 21:43:52 -0400

Subject: Re: Re: [FT] a "true Fisher Battlecruiser" for the NAC, was Battlecruisers vs. battleships

> At 2:38 AM +0100 5/17/02, Robin Paul wrote:

That increase in displacement is if I don't miss my mark, due to the fact that
a longer hull is faster in the water than a given hull of

From: Bif Smith <bif@b...>

Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 09:45:51 +0100

Subject: Re: Re: [FT] a "true Fisher Battlecruiser" for the NAC, was Battlecruisers vs. battleships

[quoted original message omitted]