Morning!
Just an fyi for you who have the FB (or will be getting it soon;) as I don't
remember anyone mentioning this earlier...
I was looking at the NAC Vandenburg-class heavy cruiser stats and
noticed
that the technical specs list her as carrying a pulse-torp, but the Ship
Systems Display shows no such thing. So I sat down just now and worked out the
mass math. I believe the SSD is correct, that the indicated pulse torp is not
normally mounted on this class of ship. That's correct, right, Jon?
Mk
> Mk wrote:
> Just an fyi for you who have the FB (or will be getting it soon ;) as
As always, the SSD and NPV are correct (after all, we checked them, right,
Mark?
;-) and the tech data, when different from the SSD, is incorrect :-) I
think the tech data was cut&pasted from the Furious-class escort cruiser
in this case, and not edited enough.
Later,
On Sun, 17 May 1998 08:11:48 -0500 (EST), "Whoa, lady, I only speak 2
> languages: English and bad english" <KOCHTE@stsci.edu> wrote:
> I was looking at the NAC Vandenburg-class heavy cruiser stats and
This is correct. Jon sent me a list of current errata for possible inclusion
with the review I did for MARS. The Vandenburg does not have a pulse torp.
If anyone wants to see the errata for the Fleet Book, please e-mail me
and I'll send it out to everyone later this week.
[...]
> Systems Display shows no such thing. So I sat down just now and
Or maybe Jon set a few 'errors' in the book to see who the sharper-eyed
pencils in the audience are? ;-)
Mk
Allan,
Please email me a copy of the errata for the Fleet Book. I don't have a copy
of the book yet, but will as soon as it shows up in California.
Enjoy,