From: Derk Groeneveld <derk@c...>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 00:27:00 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: First Full Thrust ship
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks, my first model is up online:)
First Full Thrust ship
From: Andy Cowell <andy@c...>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 19:17:19 -0500
Subject: Re: First Full Thrust ship
In message
From: Mike Stanczyk <stanczyk@p...>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:47:53 -0600 (MDT)
Subject: Re: First Full Thrust ship
Nice work! Love the paint job. Can you get a better picture of it though? Needs more depth of focus. (Of course, if you did the picture with a flat bed scanner I'll put my foot back in my mouth.) Mike > On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, Derk Groeneveld wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- http://cc5127-a.deven1.ov.nl.home.com/~derk/pictures/wargame/fullthrust/ > I'm interested in your feedback.
From: Derk Groeneveld <derk@c...>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 21:19:42 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: First Full Thrust ship
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Mike Stanczyk wrote: > Nice work! Love the paint job. Thanks:) > Can you get a better picture of it though? Some of the pictures do have a low depth of focus - sort of on purpose, to make it seem larger than just a small miniature (selected wide open diaphragm). But the other pics should have a decent depth of focus? Cheers,
From: Derk Groeneveld <derk@c...>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 20:52:50 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: First Full Thrust ship
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, Derk Groeneveld wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- DUH?! Where did _this_ suddenly come from? Sent that over a month ago! Cheers,
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 15:11:13 -0400
Subject: Re: First Full Thrust ship
> At 8:52 PM +0200 7/27/01, Derk Groeneveld wrote: There are a few mail messages coming back through that are over a month old. The Squats Re: Gurkhas uploaded and the [ft]SML question topic for example. Is there some approval process for mail messages that occurs in the UK? Because somehow the mail message in these that are (re)surfacing rather late are going through mail5.svr.pol.co.uk and clinipol.co.uk