From: Thomas Barclay <Thomas.Barclay@s...>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 18:31:44 -0500
Subject: Re: [fh] nac vexilliology was Re: Awards and ANthems(and now som
Jared spake thusly upon matters weighty: > >> Then in each country, a figure is placed under the crown to I'm glad. I thought it was a good one. > >> And commonwealth vessels would display the Gold-Crown-On-Red flag do > >these areas, larger than a state, have their own symbols? do such Seems likely. For the Crown, it leads to a commonwealth of territories each smaller in power. It pits (in an economic sense) former US regions against each other and that helps the Crown maintain control. Also, it reduces the impact of US Nationalism and helps to diverge the interests of US regions such that they don't act as one big hammer in the NAC Commonwealth. Here is another one (aside): Where is the NAC Parliament Located? > In some ways there are such divisions, in other ways, no. I am not You could have Pacific Northwest, MidWest, Pacific SouthWest (maybe this is FCT?), South, New England, Atlantic Coast, North East? Maybe some US folk on the list would suggest 5-8 regional areas the states (Minus Texas, California and probably some of NM or Arizona) could be divided into and which states would be in which regions? > Of course I have to wonder what happens to Alaska in this scenario - You mean the new Territory of Nunavut (sp?) that will encompass a lot of Yukon, NWT, and probably in the future, Alaska. Maybe this Region is known as the Artic North and their device is a Husky or maybe a Polar Bear? > >so, the nac-as-a-whole symbol is the crown, and the following things Probably we need the regional themes. > >quebec - fleur de lys What about the other south american and central american regions? Anyone care to comment or suggest what would be appropriate symbols? > Sounds good! What precedents are there for rendering the symbols onto Well, Heraldic rules (often followed on flags) indicate a Metal (Silver/White, Gold/Yellow, and a few others) can't be put on another metal and a colour (Blue, Red, Purple, Green, etc.) can't be put on another colour. I could see the Nautical Navy flag being a Navy Blue field, featuring a Golden Crown and under it a Pair of Golden Anchors crossed. (Or a single anchor?). The Space Navy might have a Midnight blue field (not quite black which is dishonour) or Navy field with a Gold Crown over a Silver 8 pointed Star. The Army might use a Red Background and Feature a Crown over a Pair of Crossed Rifles or Crossed Swords (Silver/White). The Marines might use a Navy Field with the Crown (Gold/Yellow) over both a smaller Silver/White (same thing) Star and under it a pair of Crossed Swords (Cutlasses). The Diplomatic Service may use A Red Flag, Gold Crown and a White/Silver Dove (okay its wishy washy but best I could think of). The Air Force (Close Orbit and Aerospace Control Force) would have a Light Blue Field with a Gold Crown suspended over a Silver Gull. (Or maybe a wing?). Many civil service branches would just use the standard Red Field, Gold Crown of the Commonwealth. I'd say that Member states retain the Red Field and the Crown (like we talked of above) but the symbol down below is dependent (as previously suggested) on the state in question. Civilian Judiciary might use a Red background, Gold Crown suspended over a Golden Gavel. Military courts would use the colour of background of their service. As for police, I don't have much input. Except to suggest that the Mounties might use a pair of mouse ears... (grin). This is a whole other kettle of fish.... Just like the question of where did NAC military units come from, the same question can be asked of their police. And the question of how universal and monolithic NAC law is bears examination too as this will impact policing. Tom. /************************************************