From: Beth Fulton <beth.fulton@m...>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:57:17 +1100
Subject: [fh] ice age instead?
G'day, > > Has anyone any data? A mini-ice age was thought to be the most likely consequence of human pollution a couple of decades ago, though opinions on that one have obviously changed now;) > There was a reference posted on www.jerrypournelle.com a few weeks ago There's been a fair few models studies on this one, Andreas down here has had a pretty good look amongst others. There are a few links on this one, some useful non-technical ones can be found at http://naturalscience.com/ns/cover/cover5.html and www.cicero.uio.no/media/1270.pdf If it were to happen Europe would probably get colder more severe winters, but in the US its more likely just to counter balance the general temperature rise. You're probably not going to see much of a general increase in ice cover in the Western Atlantic and its probably not going to effect the Southern hemisphere much at all ice cover wise (as far as I know but this is not my primary field so it may be best to check that one yourself). As the process of weakening the circulation system is a lot slower than the rising temperatures (or so the models suggest so far), if anything does happen it isn't likely to happen at all until about the time the KV take an interest in us...;) Overall though climate change doesn't just equal everywhere gets hotter etc. There will be wide spread redistribution of climate patterns (some storm bands being pushed poleward), with the general trend being toward more severe extremes in each season... at least that's what they thought last time I talked to Andreas, its a pretty fast moving field though and the next Nature article may well say something completely different;) Cheers