From: KH.Ranitzsch@t... (K.H.Ranitzsch)
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 11:22:48 +0200
Subject: Re: [FH] americas [Thread Warning]
[quoted original message omitted]
From: KH.Ranitzsch@t... (K.H.Ranitzsch)
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 11:22:48 +0200
Subject: Re: [FH] americas [Thread Warning]
[quoted original message omitted]
From: KH.Ranitzsch@t... (K.H.Ranitzsch)
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 15:37:02 +0200
Subject: Re: [FH] americas [Thread Warning]
[quoted original message omitted]
From: CS Renegade <njg@c...>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 23:49:58 +0100
Subject: RE: [FH] americas [Thread Warning]
From: ~ On Behalf Of Beth.Fulton@csiro.au Sent: 31 May 2002 04:22 Subject: [FH] americas Beth, you wicked girl! [1] The downfall of the US as portrayed in the GZG canon history was discussed at some length at the end of last year, circa November & December. If memory serves, it was talked about at some length, and strong (for the time) opinions were held: See http://www.warpfish.com/jhan/ft/Archive/ for: "Questions regarding NAC ground units, was SG IF morale" "[FH] Tedious Royalty Debate..." "Re: NAC Units, why do we only talk about British units" and "Nobility.... or not...." The subject titles alone should encourage the faint of heart to commence deleting before reading. [1] But I think you're excused for having other concerns at the time...
From: Beth Fulton <beth.fulton@m...>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 18:55:42 +1000
Subject: RE: [FH] americas [Thread Warning]
G'day, > Beth, you wicked girl! [1] You know me too well;P > The downfall of the US as portrayed in the GZG canon I was hoping for a reasoned discussion actually as I don't think the ones of last year ended up being that helpful. That's why I said if it upsets you don't join in. I do honestly find it interesting to try and figure what it would actually take, I'm not trying to stir $%^@. The response I'm getting (so far) are actually the kind I'm after (much good info!), which is a credit to you all;) Thanks
From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 09:03:37 -0400
Subject: Re: [FH] americas [Thread Warning]
Karl Heinz suggested > Some other ideas: This part I don't think is likely--every politico here beats the drum for "more money for better education". Not to say the US won't become non-competitive for other reasons, nor that our education system is worth a fraction of the money we pour into it. > - Increased international economic tensions lead to a trade war The *entire* rest of the world? > - Continued Latino immigration leads to strong tension in the Probably > - Terrorists or a rogue state detonate a nuke carried in a cargo Even if repairs don't take longer than anticipated, this would be a real, genuine mess. > - A massive earthquake in California No. Everyone knows it's going to happen sooner or later, nothing surprising about and no reason it should disrupt the political integrity of the country. > - A serious chemical, nuclear or bio-engineering accident in a > - Alaska decides to exploit its oil riches for itself and votes to I find that quite unlikely too.
From: John Leary <john_t_leary@y...>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 10:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [FH] americas [Thread Warning]
> --- "K.H.Ranitzsch" <KH.Ranitzsch@t-online.de> wrote: ... > Some other ideas: Nobody will believe this one, our increasing tax/ school funding is still producing declining standards. :-) Bye for now,
From: Michael Llaneza <maserati@e...>
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2002 10:47:36 -0700
Subject: Re: [FH] americas [Thread Warning]
Yup. This has already happened in my opinion. > John Leary wrote: > --- "K.H.Ranitzsch" <KH.Ranitzsch@t-online.de> wrote:
From: John D. Hamill <finnmaccool@e...>
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 04:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [FH] americas [Thread Warning]
> "K.H.Ranitzsch" <KH.Ranitzsch@t-online.de> wrote: [quoted original message omitted]