[FH] americas [Thread Warning]

8 posts ยท May 31 2002 to Jun 2 2002

From: KH.Ranitzsch@t... (K.H.Ranitzsch)

Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 11:22:48 +0200

Subject: Re: [FH] americas [Thread Warning]

[quoted original message omitted]

From: KH.Ranitzsch@t... (K.H.Ranitzsch)

Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 15:37:02 +0200

Subject: Re: [FH] americas [Thread Warning]

[quoted original message omitted]

From: CS Renegade <njg@c...>

Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 23:49:58 +0100

Subject: RE: [FH] americas [Thread Warning]

From: ~ On Behalf Of Beth.Fulton@csiro.au
Sent: 31 May 2002 04:22
Subject: [FH] americas

Beth, you wicked girl! [1]

The downfall of the US as portrayed in the GZG canon history was discussed at
some length at the end of last year, circa November & December. If memory
serves, it was talked about at some length, and strong (for the time) opinions
were held:

See http://www.warpfish.com/jhan/ft/Archive/ for:

"Questions regarding NAC ground units, was SG IF morale" "[FH] Tedious Royalty
Debate..." "Re: NAC Units, why do we only talk about British units" and
"Nobility.... or not...."

The subject titles alone should encourage the faint of heart to commence
deleting before reading.

[1] But I think you're excused for having other
concerns at the time...

From: Beth Fulton <beth.fulton@m...>

Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 18:55:42 +1000

Subject: RE: [FH] americas [Thread Warning]

G'day,

> Beth, you wicked girl! [1]

You know me too well;P

> The downfall of the US as portrayed in the GZG canon

I was hoping for a reasoned discussion actually as I don't think the ones of
last year ended up being that helpful. That's why I said if it upsets you
don't join in. I do honestly find it interesting to try and figure what it
would actually take, I'm not trying to stir $%^@. The response I'm getting (so
far) are actually the kind I'm after (much good info!), which is a credit to
you all;)

Thanks

From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>

Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 09:03:37 -0400

Subject: Re: [FH] americas [Thread Warning]

Karl Heinz suggested
> Some other ideas:

This part I don't think is likely--every politico here beats the drum
for "more money for better education". Not to say the US won't
become non-competitive for other reasons, nor that our education
system is worth a fraction of the money we pour into it.

> - Increased international economic tensions lead to a trade war

The *entire* rest of the world?

> - Continued Latino immigration leads to strong tension in the

Probably

> - Terrorists or a rogue state detonate a nuke carried in a cargo

Even if repairs don't take longer than anticipated, this would be a real,
genuine mess.

> - A massive earthquake in California

No. Everyone knows it's going to happen sooner or later, nothing surprising
about and no reason it should disrupt the political integrity of the country.

> - A serious chemical, nuclear or bio-engineering accident in a

> - Alaska decides to exploit its oil riches for itself and votes to

I find that quite unlikely too.

From: John Leary <john_t_leary@y...>

Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 10:35:36 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: Re: [FH] americas [Thread Warning]

> --- "K.H.Ranitzsch" <KH.Ranitzsch@t-online.de> wrote:
...
> Some other ideas:

Nobody will believe this one, our increasing tax/
school funding is still producing declining standards.
:-)
Bye for now,

From: Michael Llaneza <maserati@e...>

Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2002 10:47:36 -0700

Subject: Re: [FH] americas [Thread Warning]

Yup. This has already happened in my opinion.

> John Leary wrote:

> --- "K.H.Ranitzsch" <KH.Ranitzsch@t-online.de> wrote:

From: John D. Hamill <finnmaccool@e...>

Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 04:49:57 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: Re: [FH] americas [Thread Warning]

> "K.H.Ranitzsch" <KH.Ranitzsch@t-online.de> wrote:

[quoted original message omitted]