From: Tim Jones <Tim.Jones@S...>
Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 08:10:08 +0100
Subject: FB - Armour in ship design system
Armour doesn't seem to have made it into the Ship Design summary section. The MASS cost is in the rules section but not the point cost. I couldn't find it anywhere else. By reverse engineering the Arapaho I get:
From: Mike.Elliott@b...
Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 13:00:27 +0100
Subject: Re: FB - Armour in ship design system
Yes, Tim, I checked all the designs and you've got it right. Must have missed the proof reading.... Mike Tim Jones <Tim.Jones@Smallworld.co.uk> 06/05/98 08:10 Please respond to FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk To: "FTGZG List (E-mail)" <FTGZG-L@bolton.ac.uk> cc: (bcc: Mike Elliott/UK/BULL) Subject: FB - Armour in ship design system Armour doesn't seem to have made it into the Ship Design summary section. The MASS cost is in the rules section but not the point cost. I couldn't find it anywhere else. By reverse engineering the Arapaho I get:
From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 18:11:25 +0200
Subject: Re: FB - Armour in ship design system
> Tim Jones wrote: > System MASS Point Cost Correct. Or at least that's the value we design-checkers used :-)
From: Allan Goodall <agoodall@a...>
Date: Wed, 06 May 1998 23:35:11 GMT
Subject: Re: FB - Armour in ship design system
On Wed, 6 May 1998 08:10:08 +0100, Tim Jones <Tim.Jones@Smallworld.co.uk> wrote: > Armour doesn't seem to have made it into the Ship Design I've been commissioned to write a review of the Fleet Book (from a playtester's perspective) for MARS magazine. Do we have a list of Fleet Book erratta available? It would be a good thing to add at the end of the review, space permitting.