From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <schoon@a...>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 20:07:55 -0700
Subject: Extra Boarding Parties
From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <schoon@a...>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 20:07:55 -0700
Subject: Extra Boarding Parties
From: John Leary <john_t_leary@y...>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 20:34:10 -0700
Subject: Re: Extra Boarding Parties
> Sean Bayan Schoonmaker wrote: Schoon, I like the symbol, but I trust the top is tilted to the right with a small globe inserted in the middle! :-) The BP is a special purpose weapon and may only be used under 'special' circumstances. The mass is the primary item here with the cost of less importance. I feel the one mass is correct and the point cost a very good place to start, (adjust if necessary after playtest). One can consider the BP as a kind of point defence (with an imagination strech). Good luck,
From: Robertson, Brendan <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 14:53:02 +1000
Subject: RE: Extra Boarding Parties
I think this will work well, although it would be best to define them as 1 use or to mark off any casualties from the boarding action as threshold failures. (They're not coming back if they're captured or killed). 'Neath Southern Skies http://users.mcmedia.com.au/~denian/ ********************* Mary had a little LAM, It's thrusters all aglow; And everywhere that Mary went, The 'Mechs were sure to blow. > -----Original Message-----
From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <schoon@a...>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 08:37:20 -0700
Subject: RE: Extra Boarding Parties
> ROBERTSON,Brendan <Brendan.ROBERTSON@EMPLOYMENT.GOV.AU> wrote: > I think this will work well, although it would be best to define them Good point. I'll add this in with other feedback I get and post a revised version in a couple of days.
From: Michael A. Come <thorren@t...>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 02:48:02 -0400
Subject: Re: Extra Boarding Parties
Hi All, Thanks for the sugestions. Will do a little play test then get back to you all on it. Test out different sugestions you gave and see what happens. Thanks, Mike C.