EF Sourcebook, Carrier vs. Big Guns, and other thoughts

5 posts ยท Dec 6 1997 to Dec 8 1997

From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>

Date: Sat, 6 Dec 1997 11:50:02 -0600

Subject: Re: EF Sourcebook, Carrier vs. Big Guns, and other thoughts

Well, the Earthforce Source Book showed. Unfortunately, at the local store,
and not my mail box. Don't know how far in advance the distributors paid,
but I had figured my pre-pay would put me somewhere near the head of the
line. Mark can blame the PS; as for me, it's the last Chameleon Eclectic
product I'll knowingly buy.

I didn't look inside at the shop, and when it does make it to my door, I'll
just put it up on the shelf. After playing with Zeke Sparks at GenCon, I know
it'd would suck me in, create in me the desire for any extensions produce. I
won't go there.

Concerning big ships susceptability to fighters: I always enjoyed what I
perceiived as a scissors / paper / rock between capitals, 'lesser' ships
and fighters. Using just the main list ships, I saw a tendency for
capitals(cruisers seemed to float between the extremes, becoming one or the
other by situation; how like real life!), smaller ships could mass enough
firepower, especially using C's as anti-fighter, to mess up fighter
squadron days, and fighters could be massed to take out big ships.

I imagine part of why the escorts could do so well was a house rule that ships
in 'squadrons' could use PDAF's to protect the squadron, as long as they were
properly bunched.

It would seem strange that I never created odd thrust ships except that I
always used even thrust as an unwritten rule. I probably still will. I took
the example to indicate how to handle damaged drives; silly, as a thrust ten
would be beyond the max. Still, I would have prefered a round down
except that every ship would have at least one turn; damaged two-thrust
would never turn.

Course, that would go with the concept I had for a supership confrontation
that had three behemouths moving in opposing but parallel courses JUST out of
range, and unable to turn, but maybe I'll have it worked up by next GenCon.

Does anyone have more miniature 'substitutions' in mind? I think it has
been suggested that the mid-range NSL's could be converted to B5
Earthforce, and maybe some of FSL's to Narn for CMD figs. Any other
sugggestions?

The_Beast

From: Stuart Murray <smurray@a...>

Date: Sat, 6 Dec 1997 17:54:11 -0500

Subject: Re: EF Sourcebook, Carrier vs. Big Guns, and other thoughts

> Does anyone have more miniature 'substitutions' in mind? I think it has

I was thinking that the ESU carrier could, OK so you have to close one eye and
squint with the other, be used for a Primus Battle ship.

The NSL superderead seems to be a popular mini to represent a Nova
dreadnought.

From: Christopher E. Ronnfeldt <zephyr@t...>

Date: Sat, 6 Dec 1997 23:30:55 +0000 (GMT)

Subject: Re: EF Sourcebook, Carrier vs. Big Guns, and other thoughts


  

From: Ground Zero Games <jon@g...>

Date: Sun, 7 Dec 1997 10:39:12 +0000

Subject: Re: EF Sourcebook, Carrier vs. Big Guns, and other thoughts

> Well, the Earthforce Source Book showed. Unfortunately, at the local

Don't quote me on this, but I think the problem could well be that the
printers ship books directly to the distributors, rather than them going to
CE/WF and then on to distributors. CE's shipment of copies (from which
your
pre-order would presumably come) supposedly gets sent to them at the
same time as the distributor shipments go out, but I believe that when the RPG
book came out they didn't get their own supply until some days AFTER the
distributors had got theirs and shipped on to the stores.

From: Channing Faunce <channing@g...>

Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 21:25:11 -0500

Subject: Re: EF Sourcebook, Carrier vs. Big Guns, and other thoughts

> Doug_Evans/CSN/UNEBR@UNebMail.UNeb.EDU wrote:

> Does anyone have more miniature 'substitutions' in mind? I think it

There is a new Silent Death ship called the Vishnu which might be reworked
into a Primus, or more likely a Centauri Missle Cruiser.

Chan <*>