From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 22:41:12 -0400
Subject: Economics of dreadplanets
Andrew Apter: > In my campain the Dreadplanet would cost the entire tax base of Well, Stilt's got more megacredits than you've got. IIRC we decided (ie, I worked out and no one objected too bitterly) that US$4 is (roughly) Cr1. 1 million citizens at 8000Cr per year per capita GNP paying 5% of GNP into military works out to 400MCr per annum. Figure the navy gets 1/3 and the shipbuilding budget is about 1/3 of the navy's budget--based on USN about 10 years ago but it's a reasonable figure for this kind of BOTE job--and you come up with roughly 45MCr shipbuilding budget per million people per year. Caveats: You've got plenty of room here to flex the $:Cr ratio; in addition, a government that's actively at war is likely to spend something more than 5% of the GNP on the military too--I don't recall what the US was spending in WW2 but 20% is almost certainly low. USSR was spending about 18% on their military in the late Cold War; Angola spent something like 35% for a while there. Further, my per capita GNP is based on the US--a few nations might have higher but quite a few will be lower. Let's see, 5000 points = 50,000MCr / 45MCr = 1.1 billion people-years (at 5% military tax rate). If the US went to wartime 20% tax levels, it could produce a dreadplanet every year, with plenty left over for army, orbital defenses--even skirmishers <grin>.