From: Thomas Barclay <Thomas.Barclay@s...>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 17:09:08 -0500
Subject: RE: [DSII] [Tech] Battlefield Awareness (Was: [GZG] [HIST] Milit
Glover, spake thusly upon matters weighty: then the tactic of the > enemy turning his 'helmet' off and thus avoiding detection. Or your guys doing it to the vexation of the officers to avoid detection by the enemy. Also the use of > transponders to place decoy helmets and equipment on the Of course, one could argue easily that the fact you'd have come up with fake sources, hard to detect signals, etc. means you may well be able to do comms without worrying about EVERY communication giving you away. Unless the enemy has a lot of time to investigate very signal, I'd sure as heck make a point to deploy 'fakers' against forces that I thought watched the EM bands extensively. Then they'd have too much info and your units would fade into invisibility in the background of intelligence noise. Although running silent would still be the preference. Comms would probably be short, clipped, and transmitted via burst transmissions with encryption. Probably frequency hopping, maybe even on impossible to detect transmission media like mesons or neutrinos. I think if you want a rationale to ban hidden movement, you can always envision one. Tom. /************************************************