DSII: Systems Down Chit for...

4 posts ยท Jun 20 1996 to Jun 26 1996

From: starwarsnut@j... (Paul A Neher)

Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 16:21:59 -0400

Subject: Re: DSII: Systems Down Chit for...

On Wed, 19 Jun 1996 14:02:49 +0200 (MET DST) Oerjan Ohlson
> <f92-ooh@nada.kth.se> writes:

> )

> )

> )

From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>

Date: Tue, 25 Jun 1996 09:17:03 -0400

Subject: Re: DSII: Systems Down Chit for...

> On Thu, 20 Jun 1996, Paul A Neher wrote:

> It is my understanding that a "system down" chit is drawn that all the
Then is 'stealth' a system? It is described under a different header, paid for
at a different time...

Mike?

From: starwarsnut@j... (Paul A Neher)

Date: Tue, 25 Jun 1996 16:00:28 -0400

Subject: Re: DSII: Systems Down Chit for...

> Then is 'stealth' a system? It is described under a different header,
Oerjan Ohlson
> [quoted text omitted]
Page 52, under "Defensive Systems", last on the list: stealth Systems

So, I guess the answer is yes. But like any other, if you wanted to buy a
backup system, then that would increase your chance for recovery

From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>

Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 07:05:48 -0400

Subject: Re: DSII: Systems Down Chit for...

> On Tue, 25 Jun 1996, Paul A Neher wrote:

> >Then is 'stealth' a system? It is described under a different header,

> >paid for at a different time...
Good. It would have been better if this side effect was noted under
'Damage Effects', though - all that part of the rules say is that a
'systems down' vehicle may not take any Combat Action (ie, fire any weapon).

Later,