From: starwarsnut@j... (Paul A Neher)
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 16:21:59 -0400
Subject: Re: DSII: Systems Down Chit for...
On Wed, 19 Jun 1996 14:02:49 +0200 (MET DST) Oerjan Ohlson > <f92-ooh@nada.kth.se> writes: > ) > ) > )
From: starwarsnut@j... (Paul A Neher)
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 16:21:59 -0400
Subject: Re: DSII: Systems Down Chit for...
On Wed, 19 Jun 1996 14:02:49 +0200 (MET DST) Oerjan Ohlson > <f92-ooh@nada.kth.se> writes: > ) > ) > )
From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 1996 09:17:03 -0400
Subject: Re: DSII: Systems Down Chit for...
> On Thu, 20 Jun 1996, Paul A Neher wrote: > It is my understanding that a "system down" chit is drawn that all the Then is 'stealth' a system? It is described under a different header, paid for at a different time... Mike?
From: starwarsnut@j... (Paul A Neher)
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 1996 16:00:28 -0400
Subject: Re: DSII: Systems Down Chit for...
> Then is 'stealth' a system? It is described under a different header, Oerjan Ohlson > [quoted text omitted] Page 52, under "Defensive Systems", last on the list: stealth Systems So, I guess the answer is yes. But like any other, if you wanted to buy a backup system, then that would increase your chance for recovery
From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 07:05:48 -0400
Subject: Re: DSII: Systems Down Chit for...
> On Tue, 25 Jun 1996, Paul A Neher wrote: > >Then is 'stealth' a system? It is described under a different header, > >paid for at a different time... Good. It would have been better if this side effect was noted under 'Damage Effects', though - all that part of the rules say is that a 'systems down' vehicle may not take any Combat Action (ie, fire any weapon). Later,