From: Andrew Martin <Al.Bri@x...>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 09:52:21 +1300
Subject: DSII - SLAM vs Stealth
> Jon Davis <davis@albany.net> wrote: > My question and his reply is below: > Jon (GZG) made a reply to this question in April 1998. The DSII FAQ answer was taken from an archive which seemed to show only this reply: "Yes [to using the effective signature], since a slam is just another direct fire weapon that uses a firecon to aim." That answer seemed reasonable as it made all direct fire weapons have the same procedure for firing. I'll put both answers in the DSII FAQ and let players decide for themselves. A more effective solution is to consider what stealth means. If you regard stealth as camouflage and systems like the US stealth bomber, cruiser and fighter have, then Jon Tuffley's answer is best. If you regard stealth as more of an efficiency improvement, packing more systems into less space so reducing vehicle size, then the other answer is best.