From: Andrew Martin <Al.Bri@x...>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 10:53:13 +1300
Subject: Re: DSII SGII Thoughts on SLAMs for SGII
> Thomas Barclay <Thomas.Barclay@sofkin.ca> wrote: Now that's an interesting idea for putting back into DSII! AP or AT or GP loads for SLaM missiles. My initial thoughts are that the standard SLaM are GP rounds. A AP variant would draw an extra chit for infantry targets and soft skinned vehicles and would have no effect versus armoured targets. The AT variant would draw an extra chit for armoured targets, and be ineffective versus infantry and soft-skinned vehicles. Any thoughts, comments? Andrew Martin