Dirtside SLAMs

4 posts ยท Apr 27 1998 to Apr 28 1998

From: Jon Davis <davisje@n...>

Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 07:19:02 -0400

Subject: Dirtside SLAMs

On page 9 of the Dirtside rules, it states that SLAMs "cannot be 'spoofed' by
ECM or Stealth systems."

Does this mean that the defender's die type against a SLAM attack is the Basic
signature? I could not find any other mention of this in the rulebook. We have
been using effective signature, but a clarification would be helpful.

From: Geo-Hex <geohex@t...>

Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 11:28:46 +0000

Subject: Re: Dirtside SLAMs

> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 07:19:02 -0400

> On page 9 of the Dirtside rules, it states that SLAMs
Yes, since a slam is just another direct fire weapon that uses a firecon to
aim.

KR
> [quoted text omitted]

From: Tony Christney <tchristney@t...>

Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 20:25:51 -0700

Subject: Re: Dirtside SLAMs

> On page 9 of the Dirtside rules, it states that SLAMs

Interesting! I have always assumed that stealth was effective against SLAMs.
This seems to imply that it rolls against the basic signature. The question
really boils down to "is the text on pages eight and nine to be considered
'fluff' or rules?"

I too would like clarification.

> KR wrote:

which doesn't answer the question. Jon? Mike E.? What was the intention?

Are SLAM systems affected by stealth?

> Jon Davis

************************************************

From: Ground Zero Games <jon@g...>

Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 09:22:56 +0000

Subject: Re: Dirtside SLAMs

> On page 9 of the Dirtside rules, it states that SLAMs