From: Michael Blair <amfortas@h...>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1998 03:00:27 PDT
Subject: Damage Notation
Damage Notation I like the EFSB way of noting damage effects for weapons so for I propose the following standard for use when creating tables. If you don't like it please suggest something else but I think we do need a common standard. 6 Does two points of damage Bold 6 is allowed a reroll Underline MRB. One in the back is worth three in the chest.
From: Tim Jones <Tim.Jones@S...>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 11:29:20 +0100
Subject: RE: Damage Notation
On Thursday, June 04, 1998 11:00 AM, Michael Blair [SMTP:amfortas@hotmail.com] wrote: > 6 Does two points of damage Bold If there is an existing standard then adopt it. Don't invent any more wheels. I hadn't thought about this but its a good idea as long as we all use the same convention. This convention is good as it also works in combination.
From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <schoon@a...>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 08:09:53 -0700
Subject: Re: Damage Notation
> 6 Does two points of damage Bold This sounds reasonable to me.