Continuum? RE: [FT] Quiet in here, isn't it.

Which brings up questions I was just thinking of asking...

How many of the 'old crew' have tried new versions? How many like?

Personally, I find the Continuum's 'sideslip' worded so loosely, along with
the examples, as to nullify the movement structure altogether, but the young
turks are correct in labeling me a 'curmudgeon'. I HAVE used it as signature
whenever I bother.

Personal life has been taken up with a few close ones requiring immense care;
along with huge pangs of guilt and insufficiency, some moving to new
facilities may offer hope of some gaming life.

Oh, and they can't get me to shut up on LAF and TMP, so, another part of the
answer to the original post.

Doug

[quoted original message omitted]

In message <BLUPR05MB197031952B70C7FC94972D1CA83F0@BLUPR05MB1970.nampr
d05.prod.outlook.com>
> Douglas Evans <devans@nebraska.edu> wrote:

> Which brings up questions I was just thinking of asking...

> How many of the 'old crew' have tried new versions? How many like?

> Personally, I find the Continuum's 'sideslip' worded so loosely, along

How does it compare with the wording in the WDA?

On that subject, I recently had a look at the old WDA, I last updated it back
in 2003!

Relatedly, is there a 'Full Thrust Fan Creations Wiki' or similar (I've had a
look, but the only Wiki I found was the FT FAQ, last updated in 2009 IIRC).