From: Nyrath the nearly wise <nyrath@c...>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 20:37:36 -0400
Subject: Re: combat spoilers for "Movements of Fire and Shadow"
> > first, some spoiler space in case you really don't want to know
combat spoilers for "Movements of Fire and Shadow"
From: Mark A. Siefert <cthulhu@c...>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 20:25:56 -0600
Subject: Re: combat spoilers for "Movements of Fire and Shadow"
> Nyrath the nearly wise wrote: > > > > And would anybody care to hazard the stats for the I would bet a few ounces of 999 fine (I just finished reading L. Neil Smith's "The Probability Broach" so I'm on a gold standard kick.) that the new ship in "Crusade," The Excalibur, will be either be one of these White Star cruisers or destroyers. (Joe... where in the HELL did you learn navel nomenclature?)
From: Buji Kern <mrbuji@w...>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 20:18:31 -0700
Subject: Re: combat spoilers for "Movements of Fire and Shadow"
[quoted original message omitted]
From: Buji Kern <mrbuji@w...>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 20:21:22 -0700
Subject: Re: combat spoilers for "Movements of Fire and Shadow"
[quoted original message omitted]
From: John Leary <john_t_leary@y...>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 1998 15:50:09 -0700
Subject: Re: combat spoilers for "Movements of Fire and Shadow"
> Buji Kern wrote: An easy one guys, like the modern destroyer, the title 'destroyer' is a shortened form of the complete 'cruiser destroyer' type of ship. (The preceding has been a personal opinion, without basis in fact of fiction.) Bye for now,