From: Colin Nash <cmnash@d...>
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 1998 13:40:49 -0000
Subject: Re: Canada in NAC
Thomas pontificated thusly upon matters weighty: > [quoted text omitted] <snip> > Why does everyone have so much trouble envisioning a state which has Is it just me, or is the Canadian Black Hand Society beginning to make itself known here? Are we witnessing the first steps of the great Canadian coup within the NAC? <g>
From: Brian Burger <yh728@v...>
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 1998 10:15:11 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Canada in NAC
> On Sun, 6 Dec 1998, Colin Nash wrote: Of course you are. But don't worry, it won't hurt a bit...Besides, when you live in the best country in the world (the UN says so!) it's hard to be humble...<g> Furthermore, if anyone says anything about it, it won't be remembered anyway - recall that this list's archives are run by another Canadian (J. Hahn) and objecting messages will...disappear...(funny, the X-Viles never covered _this_ conspiracy...)<vbg> Seriously, Tom had a good point about the UK-US blending in the NAC being already present in Canada to some extent. (and I'm not just saying that because Tom's also a Canadian). AFAIK, the lower levels of our military are on a more-or-less US structure, but we also have Regiments. Governmentally, we have a UK-style Parliament & stuff (and no interns...). Culturally...ever noticed how many actors in Hollywierd are Cdn? OTOH, if Hollywierd were farther away Canada would be better off... Conspiratorially yours,
From: Thomas Barclay <Thomas.Barclay@s...>
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 1998 14:57:23 -0500
Subject: Re: Canada in NAC
Colin spake thusly upon matters weighty: > Thomas pontificated thusly upon matters weighty: SILENCE FOOL! DO NOT SPEAK OF SUCH MATTERS LEST THE KING'S DOGS SCENT OUR PLAN.....SOON ALL WILL BE IN PLACE..... (grin). /************************************************
From: Chen-Song Qin <cqin@e...>
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 1998 13:08:03 -0700 (MST)
Subject: Re: Canada in NAC
> On Sun, 6 Dec 1998, Brian Burger wrote: > Governmentally, we have a UK-style Parliament & stuff (and no There are parliamentary pages though... although I can't imagine Jean Chretien doing anything like that...:) > Culturally...ever noticed how many actors in Hollywierd are Cdn? OTOH, There was a TV movie made a while back exposing this conspiracy. Forgot its name though...
From: Jerry Han <jhan@w...>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1998 00:14:57 -0500
Subject: Re: Canada in NAC
> Brian Burger wrote:
Messages won't disappear, they'll just... change.
I've got the Ninth edition, NewSpeak Dictionary, sitting right here, right
beside my membership card in the Ministry of Truth.
(8-)
And for those who don't know...
Starship Jockeys
http://interact.canoe.ca/~jhan/ft
Featuring: GZG-L Mailing List Archives, back to July 1996
Entry Point to GZG-ECC II Website, February 1999
House Rules for: Honor Harrington
FT Racing
Renegade Legion "Leviathan"
and, "The Weenie Gun" (tm) (8-)
Thanks,
From: Allan Goodall <agoodall@a...>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 1998 02:08:20 GMT
Subject: Re: Canada in NAC
On Sun, 6 Dec 1998 10:15:11 -0800 (PST), Brian Burger <burger00@camosun.bc.ca> wrote: > Furthermore, if anyone says anything about it, it won't be remembered Hey! Don't you be dissing the X-Files, man... > ...ever noticed how many actors in Hollywierd are Cdn? OTOH, if More than that, have you ever noticed the number of Canadians who have infiltrated the US news establishment? Morley Safer, Dan Rather, Keith Morrison, John Roberts (I remember when he was J. D. Roberts, a local DJ and later host of The New Music on CITY-TV here in Toronto). Then there's how tied the US is to the Canadian economy. Florida is currently starting to hurt in their tourist industry because the Canadian dollar sucks... Gets you to thinking... (But if Canadians are in the NAC, who's doing all those UN peacekeeping missions...?)
From: Owen Glover <oglover@b...>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 13:30:50 +1000
Subject: RE: Canada in NAC
[quoted original message omitted]
From: Owen Glover <oglover@b...>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 17:03:57 +1000
Subject: RE: Canada in NAC
Hmm, I'll have to look up the actual book when I get home; the quote off the GZG history online is just: "2123 Islamic Federation and ESU forces clash on Earth as the ESU massacres many Muslims in an anti-Islamic pogrom in the Indian sub-continent. Diplomatic efforts result in an escalation to full scale war being averted" This infers that Pakistani's are probably bearing the brunt of this pogrom. The reference to the invasion of the indian sub-continent doesn't qualify an end state and gives no details on what was annexed or subsumed into the ESU. Jon T any comments? Owen G [quoted original message omitted]
From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 1998 01:03:20 -0800
Subject: Re: Canada in NAC
> Glover, Owen wrote: > How about the Indians forming the bulk of the UN's general troops?? The I thought the UN had high-quality troops? > Peace Keeping Garrisons, border patrols monitoring forces etc. This is Actually, they are part of ESU--remember reference to clash between ESU and IF over an anti-Muslim pogram in Indian subcontinent, which ended when ESU sacked the Hindu who came up with the idea?