From: Brendan Pratt <bastard@o...>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:56:08 +1000
Subject: Blakes 7 news
May be time to dig the videos and work out new ships for Blakes7. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/705922.stm
From: Brendan Pratt <bastard@o...>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:56:08 +1000
Subject: Blakes 7 news
May be time to dig the videos and work out new ships for Blakes7. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/705922.stm
From: Steve Pugh <steve@p...>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:01:33 +0100
Subject: Re: Blakes 7 news
> On 30 Jul 2003 at 21:56, Brendan Robertson wrote: > May be time to dig the videos and work out new ships for Blakes7. That's from April 2000. This week's news story is at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/tv_and_radio/3102295.stm And frankly I'll believe it when I see it. Paul Darrow's been trying to get this off the ground for years and the money still isn't all in place.
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 10:31:32 -0400
Subject: Re: Blakes 7 news
> At 1:01 PM +0100 7/30/03, Steve Pugh wrote: Look at how long Richard Hatch tried to get Battle Star Galactica redone.
From: Nyrath the nearly wise <nyrath@c...>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 21:43:29 -0400
Subject: Re: Blakes 7 news
> Ryan Gill wrote: Yes, and he's still trying.
From: Michael Brown <mwbrown@s...>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 21:45:33 -0700
Subject: RE: Blakes 7 news
BSG has a fan base large enough for factions?
From: Nyrath the nearly wise <nyrath@c...>
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 17:54:51 -0400
Subject: Re: Blakes 7 news
> Michael Brown wrote: I'm sorry, I didn't make myself clear. It isn't the fan base that has the factions. It's the *producers*. Richard Hatch wanted to produce a new Galactica, remaining faithful to the original. He wrote three BSG novels, and was shopping the concept around, looking for backers. Meanwhile, the corporate executives who had
From: Glenn Higgins <res0udaa@v...>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 17:38:45 -0500
Subject: RE: Blakes 7 news
Edward James Olmos who will play Adama in the new series said: "There's no two ways around it. If I were a purist, I wouldn't watch it. Don't waste your time. Get the old version on DVD. Don't hurt yourself. Don't go through the pain." I tend to agree. Starbuck a *woman*?!? sheesh. If everyone wants to see a new series exactly in every detail identical to the old one, guess what, it will never happen. The idea is to be as open as possible to a new interpretation of the story. I admit I'm puzzled by the decision to make Starbuck and Boomer women; I don't get it. But I'll wait to see the ideas and a new view of things before I condemn it. It just might be a killer idea that will blow all of our minds. Or it might be just a slightly different take on an old story. I'm more disappointed by what I see as a slight to Richard Hatch on this whole project. According to what I read, Hatch was negotiating with the studio, which owned the TV rights. Moyer worked with Larson, who had the movie rights. Now, isn't a SciFi channel series TV? Or am I missing some crucial developments?
From: Michael Llaneza <maserati@e...>
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 15:46:18 -0700
Subject: Re: Blakes 7 news
They're doing it as a miniseries, which is more like a group of films than a television show. On the other hand, there have been the usual rumors about a series "if the miniseries does well". They might be able to get away with a series based on their original work, but Hatch might sue. > Glenn Higgins wrote: > Edward James Olmos who will play Adama in the