Bigger is better? Re: Ainsty INAPs

5 posts ยท Nov 23 1999 to Nov 24 1999

From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>

Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 07:25:17 -0600

Subject: Bigger is better? Re: Ainsty INAPs

Just out of curiosity, does anyone think 'invisible' figs work being larger?
After looking at the comparison piccies, I realized I probably would prefer
them bigger for the same reason I have problems with TOO successful
camo paint schemes. ;->=

The_Beast

From: Thomas Pope <tpope@c...>

Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 08:54:11 -0500

Subject: Re: Bigger is better? Re: Ainsty INAPs

> devans@uneb.edu wrote:

Hmm, I'd never thought of it that way. I guess in this context I don't mind
them bigger. (since they're not really that 'predator-like' I don't mind
them being whatever size)

My dream still is to have the Eureka 'hunters' in the flexable transparent
resin used by Fortress Figures. Since they actually spin cast the resin, it
holds a lot of detail, and since it's flexable, it can handle the thin
weapons. It'll never happen though...

Tom (not quite sure what to do with the INAP's now that he's got them)

From: Tim Jones <Tim.Jones@S...>

Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 15:35:39 -0000

Subject: RE: Bigger is better? Re: Ainsty INAPs

> My dream still is to have the Eureka 'hunters' in the flexable

I'd prefer the Hunters to the GZG Kravak going on the pictures

From: Ted Arlauskas <ted@n...>

Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 19:35:30 -0800

Subject: Re: Bigger is better? Re: Ainsty INAPs

I think bigger 'invisible' figures would be fine -
my only question is, what paint scheme are you going to use on them?;)

From: Andrew Martin <Al.Bri@x...>

Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 17:16:24 +1300

Subject: Re: Bigger is better? Re: Ainsty INAPs

> Ted wrote:

I was thinking of my can of invisible any colour paint, these two tinkers gave
me, to paint my emperor with...