From: Alan and Carmel Brain <aebrain@w...>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 12:52:13 +1100
Subject: Re: Backflow of Colonists
> <snip>
From: Alan and Carmel Brain <aebrain@w...>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 12:52:13 +1100
Subject: Re: Backflow of Colonists
> <snip>
From: Edward Lipsett <translation@i...>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 10:57:43 +0900
Subject: Re: Backflow of Colonists
Life support is not negligible. Take a look at what it costs to take a boat across the Pacific as opposed to an airplane... food! (or in space, food, air, water). > Alan E Brain wrote: > But assuming the colony transports aren't designed for a 1-way voyage,
From: Brendan Pratt <bastard@o...>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 14:18:30 +1100
Subject: Re: Backflow of Colonists
> But assuming the colony transports aren't designed for a 1-way voyage, You are assuming negligible life support costs and two way transports - perhaps drawing a long bow IMHO. No commercial transport will dead head over interstellar distances - (Interstate trucks won't do it!), I feel that ships would be one way and be consumed at point of termination or would be two way with raw product coming back - an incredibly affluent colonisation project could pay for a 1/2 empty trip, but it would be unlikely that anyone is going to be that well off and still want or need to send out colonists. However, even if there are minimal costs involved in a return trip, most if not all colonists are going to have literally nothing to pay for their return trip - in addition, a colonist will not work out his/her "unsuitablity" (for want of a better word) in a short period - it would be unlikely for a two way vessel to hang around for very long - after the ship leaves, he/she doesn't get to ring the port authority and say "I'm sorry but I want to go home". > Of course the colony transports might well be designed for just a Which is how I see most colonisation projects operating.
From: Beth Fulton <beth.fulton@m...>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 12:27:25 +1100
Subject: RE: Backflow of Colonists
G'day, > an incredibly affluent colonisation project > colonists. However, even if there are minimal costs involved in a I was thinking slightly longer term than the initial colonisation event or even the first decade or so, but once the colony is fully established and has interstellar trade going on (maybe that's just my view of the GZGverse) then I'd expect to see some backflow, though it may not be on the scales seen around Earth (though even here some migrations are one way - my Granddad came out and never got enough cash together to go back even for a visit). Cheers
From: B Lin <lin@r...>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 09:04:20 -0700
Subject: RE: Backflow of Colonists
Another reason for back flow, might be after 5-10 years some of the children have grown up enough to pursue graduate studies and are sent back to the core worlds for a graduate education that is not available on the colony world. --Binhan > -----Original Message-----