Armour and Cover Answer:

2 posts ยท Jan 10 2005 to Jan 10 2005

From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>

Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:45:25 -0500

Subject: RE: Armour and Cover Answer:

> I've always played that it was Open. IMO PA should be big and scary, as

per the open shift. I don't like the idea of PA behind a brick wall having the
same protection as D8 armour behind a brick wall.

Whereas I'm not sure that PA should get any extra armor benefit from hiding in
a bush.

From: Rrok Anroll <coldnovemberrain_2000@y...>

Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:17:28 -0800 (PST)

Subject: RE: Armour and Cover Answer:

Perhaps there should be a ruling in regards to soft cover... where it doesn't
provide additional armor benefit to PA or armored vehicles against anything
other than small arms fire...

> --- "laserlight@quixnet.net" <laserlight@quixnet.net> wrote:

> >I've always played that it was Open. IMO PA should be big and scary,