From: Phillip E. Pournelle <pepourne@n...>
Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 11:22:36 -0700
Subject: APSW from DS to SG
Hello, There was a discussion about the use of heavy machine guns to represent APSWs in StarGrunt. I proposed that one should consider using the RFAC 1/2 as an anti-infantry weapon. It costs 10 points (the Same as a stand alone APSW) and has the same effective range against infantry (12 inches). Then I suggested that one should make the number of chits drawn for an RFAC-1/2 against infantry to be three. I still hold to that argument and to my postings of Star Grunt weapons and their associated costs. However, there is an advantage to having a set of light, meadium and heavy machine guns that take up a certain amount of space with their own results. I think that the free APSW should be the 4 point costing squad support weapon in a external mount. However, if someone wants to spend the 10 points for a HMG in an internal mount, that should be available as well. I think the difference in the two systems is this. The RFAC has been show as an effective weapon against infantry (Bradleys, Cobras and Apaches have shown that). The RFAC relies more on accuracy and lethality of the single round. Using the fire control system of a RFAC makes it more accurate and the lethality of the individual round would be great against Powered Armour. Meanwhile, the MMG and HMG would use the volume of fire as their main attribute. This and the fact that they take up less space on a vehicle makes them a good alternative. Would someone please send me the posts of the Heavy Machine Gun data? Thank you, Phil P. Gort, Klaatu barada nikto!