From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 14:09:35 -0600
Subject: Alternate CPV? Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question to you all.....
How difficult would it be to make a CPV for an alternate-to-native-FTII system (vector, if you want to call it that)? Then you could, at least, balance designs in a battle, even if the designs don't have the same balance between rule sets. The_Beast
From: Oerjan Ariander <oerjan.ariander@t...>
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 11:24:59 +0100
Subject: Re: Alternate CPV? Re: [GZG] [OFFICIAL] Question to you all.....
> Doug Evans wrote: > How difficult would it be to make a CPV for an alternate-to-native-FTII Depends on whether or not you want computer support to be required to use the points system. For a "back-of-envelope"-style system which doesn't involve square roots and similar maths functions it is very difficult; for Starmada-style systems which *do* involve such maths functions it is "only" time-consuming. Regards,